Skip to content

Releases: kivikakk/comrak

0.3.0

04 Oct 03:55
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

Changes since last release (0.2.14...0.3.0)

  • Significant test coverage and code clean up. (#82, #83, Brian Anderson)
  • Description list support. (#86, Ayose Cazorla)
  • Example use of comrak to convert CommonMark documents into S-expressions. (#86, Ayose Cazorla)
  • Footnotes are now enabled via an extension option, not a flag of its own. (#87)
  • Extend cmark-gfm compatibility to include all extension and regression tests. (#87)

0.2.14

04 Oct 03:55
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

Changes since last release (0.2.13...0.2.14)

  • Speed enhancements. (#76, Brian Anderson)
  • Target latest spec; bring comrak closer into line with cmark. (#81, Brian Anderson and Ashe Connor)

0.2.13

22 Jun 00:02
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Speed enhancements. (#75, Shaquille Johnson)

0.2.12

22 Jun 00:01
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Add safety options per the reference C implementation. (#67)

0.2.11

21 Jun 23:59
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Expose Arena type so users don't need to bring it in themselves (#66, Vincent Prouillet).

0.2.10

04 May 00:30
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Bring up to date with latest spec.
  • Fix parsing of tables nested in other block elements (#61, Brian Anderson).
  • Protect against stack smashing in inline processors and CommonMark and HTML formatters (#63, Brian Anderson).

0.2.9

04 May 00:30
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Fix a corner case in the ATX header parser (#53, Brian Anderson).
  • Fix grammar for scanning table marker rows (#55, Brian Anderson).
  • Add smart punctuation (#57).

0.2.8

04 May 00:29
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Add default-info-string argument/option to specify a default language in fenced code blocks. (Thanks to @steveklabnik for the suggestion.)

0.2.7

21 Jan 00:53
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Use pest instead of regexes for lexing.

0.2.6

19 Jan 23:45
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Fixed a bug where back-to-back emphases would not be processed correctly. (#45; thanks to @SSJohns for the report.)