Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SUPIR to use FLUX instead SDXL models ? #159

Open
web2299 opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

SUPIR to use FLUX instead SDXL models ? #159

web2299 opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@web2299
Copy link

web2299 commented Sep 2, 2024

I wonder if it will be possible SUPIR to use Flux instead SDXL models ? If this is already possible can someone share workflow please ? Thanks in advance !

@kijai
Copy link
Owner

kijai commented Sep 2, 2024

No, SUPIR is basically a custom controlnet for SDXL, it won't work with anything else.

@web2299
Copy link
Author

web2299 commented Sep 3, 2024

kijai thanks for the answer !

@Metatronovich
Copy link

I wonder if it will be possible SUPIR to use Flux instead SDXL models ? If this is already possible can someone share workflow please ? Thanks in advance !

This seems like overly complicated but it claims success on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExF471Q1Goo
hope to get a comment on the subject from @kijai as well

@kijai
Copy link
Owner

kijai commented Sep 10, 2024

I wonder if it will be possible SUPIR to use Flux instead SDXL models ? If this is already possible can someone share workflow please ? Thanks in advance !

This seems like overly complicated but it claims success on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExF471Q1Goo hope to get a comment on the subject from @kijai as well

Of course you can still use SUPIR normally with Flux outputs, you just can't use the Flux model in the SUPIR pipeline itself as it's for SDXL.

There's also this node: https://github.com/city96/SD-Latent-Interposer

Which is potentially helpful as it allows using Flux latents more directly into SUPIR, removing the need to decode/encode between the pipelines.

@ZeroCool22
Copy link

I wonder if it will be possible SUPIR to use Flux instead SDXL models ? If this is already possible can someone share workflow please ? Thanks in advance !

This seems like overly complicated but it claims success on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExF471Q1Goo hope to get a comment on the subject from @kijai as well

Of course you can still use SUPIR normally with Flux outputs, you just can't use the Flux model in the SUPIR pipeline itself as it's for SDXL.

There's also this node: https://github.com/city96/SD-Latent-Interposer

Which is potentially helpful as it allows using Flux latents more directly into SUPIR, removing the need to decode/encode between the pipelines.

Can you provide a workflow ready to use?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants