-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SUPIR to use FLUX instead SDXL models ? #159
Comments
No, SUPIR is basically a custom controlnet for SDXL, it won't work with anything else. |
kijai thanks for the answer ! |
This seems like overly complicated but it claims success on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExF471Q1Goo |
Of course you can still use SUPIR normally with Flux outputs, you just can't use the Flux model in the SUPIR pipeline itself as it's for SDXL. There's also this node: https://github.com/city96/SD-Latent-Interposer Which is potentially helpful as it allows using Flux latents more directly into SUPIR, removing the need to decode/encode between the pipelines. |
Can you provide a workflow ready to use? |
I wonder if it will be possible SUPIR to use Flux instead SDXL models ? If this is already possible can someone share workflow please ? Thanks in advance !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: