Rename action.name to action.id?

[kevinswiber]

We're adding an ID property to sub-entities. The question came up as to whether we should rename action.name to action.id for consistency.

See: #31 (comment)

[ericelliott]

I'm not convinced. Is the role of action.name the same as entity ids? (I don't think it is). Is it a requirement that action.name is unique? I don't see that requirement in the readme. What about field.name?

[gxxcastillo]

I agree with Eric, this would depend on whether action.name is intended to be unique. (I've always considered it to be unique even though the spec doesn't state it has to be)

I think field.name makes sense as is, as its consistent with html inputs and its ok to have more than one field with the same name.

[apsoto]

all things being equal, I'd vote for consistency.

[ericelliott]

I would not change field.name. I'm on the fence about action.name.