Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance current integration between Kedro and Ibis #4190

Open
1 of 10 tasks
deepyaman opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 10 tasks

Enhance current integration between Kedro and Ibis #4190

deepyaman opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@deepyaman
Copy link
Member

deepyaman commented Sep 24, 2024

Description

Given the existing (admittedly-basic) Ibis integration (via ibis.TableDataset) has garnered interest and usage, we would like to take some time to address some of the enhancements requested by users (and others that will generally improve Kedro user experience with Ibis backends).

The priorities below are an initial rough prioritization; please comment if certain things (items below and those not yet on the list) would be important for you, your team, or to users you've heard from!

Issues

@deepyaman
Copy link
Member Author

deepyaman commented Sep 24, 2024

Tagging some people I've seen active on both Kedro and Ibis repos or that I know have played with the integration, as would love your thoughts on whether I'm missing things that you all have run into and would like to see addressed, as well as your views on respective priorities of these issues!

@mark-druffel @inigohidalgo @datajoely @galenseilis @gitgud5000 @filipeo2-mck @astrojuanlu @vishu1994 @RicardoQuirozQB @gtauzin

@galenseilis
Copy link

Related: Galileo-Galilei/kedro-pandera#88 (comment)

@deepyaman
Copy link
Member Author

Related: Galileo-Galilei/kedro-pandera#88 (comment)

Thanks @galenseilis! I've gone ahead and linked that above; didn't know there was already an issue you'd opened covering it. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants