You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I use the graphql inspector as part of my CI workflow, there are times when breaking changes to the schema are expected. The inspector already supports bypassing breaking change checks with a label, but it does not make clear what the correct label to use is.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like the breaking change message to include a suggestion of what label to use in case the breaking change is expected
Describe alternatives you've considered
I could add something to my GH workflow checking the exit code of the graphql inspector and then adding a comment with a suggestion for what label to add, but it seems much cleaner to have it be included in the inspector output instead
Additional context
Happy to put up a PR for this if it seems reasonable :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I use the graphql inspector as part of my CI workflow, there are times when breaking changes to the schema are expected. The inspector already supports bypassing breaking change checks with a label, but it does not make clear what the correct label to use is.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like the breaking change message to include a suggestion of what label to use in case the breaking change is expected
Describe alternatives you've considered
I could add something to my GH workflow checking the exit code of the graphql inspector and then adding a comment with a suggestion for what label to add, but it seems much cleaner to have it be included in the inspector output instead
Additional context
Happy to put up a PR for this if it seems reasonable :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: