You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, UncertainValue(v) where v is some vector will trigger kernel density estimation of the distribution of v.
It would be nice to be able to differentiate between a simple population and a weighted population. Assume population is a vector and wts is a vector of weights associated with the elements of population. We'd then have the syntax UncertainValue(population) construct a EquiprobablePopulation(or something like that) and UncertainValue(population, wts) construct a WeightedPopulation (or something like that).
This way, a user can seamlessly use the resampling methods from Bootstrap.jl and Jackknife to sample equiprobably populations, while the fallback resampling method for the other uncertain value types is BasicSampling (see common interface suggestion in #24)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently,
UncertainValue(v)
wherev
is some vector will trigger kernel density estimation of the distribution ofv
.It would be nice to be able to differentiate between a simple population and a weighted population. Assume
population
is a vector andwts
is a vector of weights associated with the elements ofpopulation
. We'd then have the syntaxUncertainValue(population)
construct aEquiprobablePopulation
(or something like that) andUncertainValue(population, wts)
construct aWeightedPopulation
(or something like that).This way, a user can seamlessly use the resampling methods from
Bootstrap.jl
andJackknife
to sample equiprobably populations, while the fallback resampling method for the other uncertain value types isBasicSampling
(see common interface suggestion in #24)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: