You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The reason for a new budget is because after looking into the possible high delivery and customs costs we thought that using a global print-on-demand provider will help to keep those costs reasonably low and also remove the swag storage costs. As a result my final proposal is to move forward with this new approach focused on using Shopify and Printful as print-on-demand provider.
In addition will need to pay an Illustrator/Designer to produce all the designs as part of the shop setup. This cost is also included in the proposal.
In summary
A 8K budget was already approved here #4 , and this new call for votes is to make sure we have the support of the leading team for a 50% reduction the estimated costs but also pay an Illustrator/Designer to produce the swag designs.
Context
This issue is to ask the TSC for vote to approve/reject the new Swag budget detailed in this issue comment: json-schema-org/community#678 (comment).
The reason for a new budget is because after looking into the possible high delivery and customs costs we thought that using a global print-on-demand provider will help to keep those costs reasonably low and also remove the swag storage costs. As a result my final proposal is to move forward with this new approach focused on using Shopify and Printful as print-on-demand provider.
In addition will need to pay an Illustrator/Designer to produce all the designs as part of the shop setup. This cost is also included in the proposal.
In summary
A 8K budget was already approved here #4 , and this new call for votes is to make sure we have the support of the leading team for a 50% reduction the estimated costs but also pay an Illustrator/Designer to produce the swag designs.
(Discussed in Open Community Working Meeting 2024-04-08 json-schema-org/community#688)
See voting process here.
Related
Replaces #4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: