Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance DateTime Extension Methods for Clarity and Efficiency #154

Open
HappyLife2 opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Enhance DateTime Extension Methods for Clarity and Efficiency #154

HappyLife2 opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@HappyLife2
Copy link
Contributor

Issue Summary

The current implementation faces several efficiency and readability challenges:

  • Inefficient Time Setting: The code sequentially adds hours, minutes, and seconds, which is less efficient than directly setting the time.
  • Complex IsBetween Logic: The logic used in the IsBetween method is complex and hard to follow, impacting readability and maintainability.
  • Lack of Exception Handling: There's no error handling for time parsing, which could lead to runtime errors.
  • Unnecessary using Directives: The code includes using directives that aren't utilized, adding unnecessary clutter.

Proposed Refactoring

To enhance the code's performance, readability, and robustness, the following refactoring steps are proposed:

  • Direct DateTime Construction: Refactor the methods to construct DateTime objects directly, improving efficiency.
  • Simplify Time Comparison Logic: Streamline the IsBetween logic for easier understanding and maintenance.
  • Incorporate Error Handling: Add exception handling for time parsing to prevent runtime errors and improve reliability.
  • Clean Up Code: Remove unnecessary using directives to declutter the codebase.

These improvements aim to significantly boost the usability and maintainability of the code, making it more robust and user-friendly.

Repository owner deleted a comment from Alice23caroll Apr 20, 2024
Repository owner deleted a comment from Alice23caroll Apr 20, 2024
Repository owner deleted a comment from Alice23caroll Apr 20, 2024
Repository owner deleted a comment from Alice23caroll Apr 20, 2024
@GautamKandula
Copy link

I'd like to help solve this issue however, this is my first time assisting in any kind of development so I dont quite know how these things work

@jneimanlegal
Copy link

The date/time faction isnt the issue sis. Its the measurement used to comprehend the data on a binary level.
Time is colloquially thought of as seconds, minutes and hours. Instead use a binary formula that measures in distance.

Ex. Point A --------------------- number of 0/1 -------------- that it takes to get to Point b

Not that you have developed a link between the Arc and the Light, simply retrace the light pattern your memory
a cool of period is recommended. Note: If you think everyone is going too fast, DO NOT try and match speed,
instead SLOW DOWN, eventually the inertia will cause people around you to slow down to match, not assume you
are relative to their time, space & manner

2ac/4xy=0.018799 use this formula for the NEW ISSUE CODE

@VoltagedDebunked
Copy link

Hello, which files are specifically affected by the issue? so i can help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants