-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature]: Support Jaeger-v2 Operator #2411
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
This was referenced Jan 8, 2024
not sure if we actually need helm charts as we have to deploy via the kubernetes operator method still need to have a discussion with otel operator folks |
dipankardas011
added a commit
to dipankardas011/jaeger-operator
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2024
only the default is tested TODO: need to add configmap support related to Issue jaegertracing#2411 Signed-off-by: Dipankar Das <[email protected]>
dipankardas011
added a commit
to dipankardas011/jaeger-operator
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2024
only the default is tested TODO: need to add configmap support related to Issue jaegertracing#2411 Signed-off-by: Dipankar Das <[email protected]>
yurishkuro
changed the title
[Feature]: Support Jaeger-v2
[Feature]: Support Jaeger-v2 Operator
Aug 31, 2024
Closing as a duplicate of #2717 (which was moved from Jaeger repo) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Requirement
Once Jaeger-v2 (jaegertracing/jaeger#4843) reaches production readiness and feature parity, we should support it in the operator.
Problem
Jaeger-v2 is based on OpenTelemetry Collector and uses completely different configuration mechanism:
Proposal
I would like to hear what maintainers of this repo think about the best approach. Can we come up with a roadmap of how jaeger-v2 will be supported by the operator? Is there some common approach we can use with the OTEL operator?
Open questions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: