A programming language derivative of BrainFuck with the addition of shared state and parallelization
My interpreter should be fully functional with the exception of input while in a thread. idk whats up with that but I'm gonna blame all my problems on java.
ParallelFuck adds 6 new operators to brainfuck
| Operator | Description |
|---|---|
| ( | start new thread |
| ) | close thread |
| _ | join on last thread created |
| & | send value at pointer to transfer cell |
| ^ | put value in transfer cell at position n of universal tape |
| * | replace value at pointer with value at position n of universal tape |
Memory in ParallelFuck is shared through a universal tape. The universal tape cannot be accessed directly. Values are sent to and retrieved from the universal tape through the 'transfer cell'. Values can be placed in the transfer cell, and then sent to a cell in the universal tape. To access values in the universal tape, the value must be first staged in the transfer cell, and then placed into the current active cell of the local tape.
When accessing the universal tape, the value of the active cell (the cell in the local tape which the pointer is pointing to) will be used as the index.
++
& put '2' into transfer cell. the value of the active cell is now 0
^ put '2' at position 0 of universal tape. the value in the transfer cell is now null
+++
& put '3' into transfer cell. the value of the active cell is now 0
+^ set value of active cell to 1. put '3' at position 1 of universal tape
- set value at pointer to 0
* replace value of active cell with the value at position 0 of the universal tape
Code placed inside of parentheses will run inside a new thread. Each thread has its own local tape and transfer cell. The '_' operator waits until the last thread created has terminated (much like java's join method (I'm writing this shit in java, so its literally gonna be java's join method))
When a new thread is spawned, the thread is scoped to the thread which spawned it.
In the following example, one thread is spawned from the main thread, and a second is spawned from the new thread. The main thread then tries to join twice. This would result in an error.
(
(
...
)
...
)
_
_ throws error, join on non-existant thread
One can spawn and join on two threads like so:
(
...
)
(
...
)
_
_
Another method:
(
(
...
)
_
)
_
The following program spawns 2 new threads to concurrently get the values for all 3 characters of output. The additional threads transfer these values back to main, where they are then outputted
( start new thread
+++++++++
[ set value to 72
>++++++++
<-
]
>&
^ put value in position 0 of universal tape
)
( start second new thread
++++++++++
[
>++++++++++
<-
]
>+++++ set value to 105
&
+^ put 105 in position 1 of universal tape
)
+++++
[
>++++++
<-
]
>+++ set value to 33
_ wait for second thread to finish
_ wait for first thread to finish
>*. get value at position 0 of universal tape and print it
>+
*. get value at position 1 of universal tape and print it
<<. go back 2 cells and print
ParallelFuck is a superset of brainfuck; all brainfuck programs should be compatible with ParallelFuck, assuming they don't parallelfuck's unique instructions in comments.