NFIX2: bingx: Could not fetch historical candle (OHLCV) data

[znxn]

Hi,
When I used the NFIX2(v12.0.640) or NFIX4(v14.0.339) on bingx exchange, the bot stopped with the following warning:
2023-10-21 23:46:24 - freqtrade.exchange.common - WARNING - _async_get_candle_history() returned exception: "Could not fetch historical candle (OHLCV) data for pair BTC/USDT due to ExchangeError. Message: bingx {"code ":100204,"msg":"","timestamp":1697946384613}". Giving up.
This is not just for BTC/USDT, warning happens for all pairs in pairlists.
Exchange error 100204 refers to no data.
While other strategies do not have this error on bingx and work correctly. For example, NFIV7 and NFING work.

[tolgakaratas]

did you try with other standart strategies ?
it seems like you have another issue with your freqtrade installation or with your exchange. maybe you should upgrade freqtrade and it will install a new version of ccxt library

[znxn]

FT v2023.09
CCXT v4.1.20

In addition to NFIV7 and NFING, I have tested some other strategies with bingx exchange and I don't have error 100204 in any of them and the trade is completed. I am not sure if these strategies are standard, but they work without error 100204.
NFIX2 works correctly with kocoin and gateio exchanges and there is only problem with bingx.

[iterativv]

It is possible that they don't have BTC/USDT pair ?

[znxn7717]

They have BTC/USDT. I still can't find where the problem is. But for now I use an alternative solution using Message WebSocket. I intercept the signals for kucoin and deliver them to bingx, and the trades are done successfully in bingx.
I just used Message Websocket and it worked. But also maybe it is possible to build a bridge strategy using Producer/Consumer mode to share orders for multiple exchanges or for multiple bots.

[meesvw]

This error is normally generated when an exchange doesn't have enough volume or doesn't provide more candles than said amount. You can read the following issue which has the same problem on the same exchange, freqtrade/freqtrade#9074 (comment)