20231013 - misspelling

Author: isaactpetersen

05-Reliability.Rmd

@@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ How confident are we about a child's true score on the construct (antisocial beh
 10. For many ways of estimating test–retest reliability, we assume that the true association between the construct at T1 and the construct at T2 is 1.0 (that is, the association of the true scores is 1.0).
 According to the attenuation formula (that attenuates the association due to measurement error), if the true association between the construct at T1 and the construct at T2 was 1.0 and the reliability of the measure was .8, the observed test–retest correlation would be $r = .80$.
 According to the attenuation formula, what would the observed test–retest correlation be if the true association was .9 and the reliability of the measure was .8?
-11.	According to the disattenuation formula (to correct for attenuation of the association due to measurement error), what would be the true test-rest association of the construct of antisocial behavior if the reliability of the Antisocial Behavior subscale was $r = .6299494$?
+11.	According to the disattenuation formula (to correct for attenuation of the association due to measurement error), what would be the true test–retest association of the construct of antisocial behavior if the reliability of the Antisocial Behavior subscale was $r = .6299494$?
 
 ### Answers {#exercisesAnswers-reliability}