From 313ad6cf1ae91e2a7e0e7502994a77c84553850c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petersen Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:53:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] 20241011 - satisfaction of search --- 18-Interview-DSM.Rmd | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/18-Interview-DSM.Rmd b/18-Interview-DSM.Rmd index a5fd330a..a2d4874e 100644 --- a/18-Interview-DSM.Rmd +++ b/18-Interview-DSM.Rmd @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ A problem of the unstructured interview is that taking a different "conversation The unstructured interview is susceptible to multiple forms of [bias](#bias), such as halo effects when dealing with a polite client.\index{interview!unstructured}\index{bias} Another important form of (cognitive) [bias](#bias) is confirmation [bias](#bias), in which clinicians look for evidence that confirms their hypothesis about the client, which leads to the tendency to stop the interview once the first diagnosis is identified, and to fewer diagnoses.\index{interview!unstructured}\index{bias!confirmatory} This is known as *diagnostic overshadowing*.\index{interview!unstructured}\index{bias!confirmatory} +Diagnostic overshadowing is analogous to challenges that radiologists have in identifiying a second tumor after already identifying one tumor, known as "satisfaction of search" [@Fleck2010].\index{bias!confirmatory} The unstructured interview is also susceptible to race, gender, class [bias](#bias), etc.\index{interview!unstructured}\index{bias} In general, unstructured interviews show low [reliability](#reliability).