Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

G2.1: Adopt new ServiceX frontend version 3.0 #1

Open
matthewfeickert opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

G2.1: Adopt new ServiceX frontend version 3.0 #1

matthewfeickert opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member Author

matthewfeickert commented Jun 10, 2024

From the 2024-06-10 Executive Board meeting, we're going to need to have a more definite roadmap here. @bbockelm suggested a strategy meeting, which is realistically needed.

@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member Author

The ServiceX client v3.0.0 release is now out.

@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member Author

@ponyisi @gordonwatts @BenGalewsky Can you comment on the overall integration status of the v3.0.0 release of the client into existing workflows, like the AGC demonstrators or public demos?

@ponyisi
Copy link

ponyisi commented Oct 2, 2024

Hi @matthewfeickert - I would also ping @alexander-held and @oshadura - what I do know is that we have a PR (pending a few small cleanups) for integrating this in the AGC repo with ATLAS and CMS examples. But I think that is more or less what has been done from the ServiceX side.

@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member Author

matthewfeickert commented Oct 3, 2024

I'm also noticing that in the ServiceX client docs for FuncADL Query Type that the full user docs are listed as @gordonwatts's https://github.com/gordonwatts/xaod_usage Jupyter Book. However, that Jupyter Book isn't using the v3.0.x API, so this will be important to update for us to be able to say that the v3.0.x client has been adopted.

Cross reference issues:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants