Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extending intake-esm to RDA holdings: add support for ERA5 Reanalysis #66

Closed
andersy005 opened this issue May 6, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed
Labels
usage question User questions which do not appear to be bugs or enhancements.

Comments

@andersy005 andersy005 added accepted usage question User questions which do not appear to be bugs or enhancements. labels May 6, 2019
@andersy005 andersy005 added the RDA label May 6, 2019
This was referenced May 8, 2019
@andersy005
Copy link
Member Author

Addressed by #68

@mickaellalande
Copy link

Is ERA5 reanalysis accessible through intake? Is there an example in the documentation of how to access it?

@andersy005
Copy link
Member Author

Is ERA5 reanalysis accessible through intake? Is there an example in the documentation of how to access it?

Unfortunately no. I opened an issue here: NCAR/intake-esm-datastore#88 to keep track of this... Will ping you once there's an update

@wachsylon
Copy link

wachsylon commented Mar 8, 2022

@andersy005

I made one for dkrz era5 data which is on our HPC's disk storage. That means, the data access also only works on Mistral.

dkrz_cdp=intake.open_catalog("https://swift.dkrz.de/v1/dkrz_a44962e3ba914c309a7421573a6949a6/intake-esm/dkrz_data-pool_cloudcatalog.yaml")
esm_dkrz_era=dkrz_cdp.dkrz_era5_disk_grb_fromcloud

should work.

However, it is based on raw grb data and intake-esm does not really support grb. We would need a default engine here for grib. The one i use is cfgrib. You may say that users can provide that but since there is no grib_kwargs, I cannot for example merge grb assets with netcdf assets. Which is why I say there is no grb support in intake-esm.

Best,
Fabi

@andersy005
Copy link
Member Author

@wachsylon, I concur. We should expand the specification to allow intake-esm catalogs to contain grib: https://github.com/intake/intake-esm/blob/main/docs/source/explanation/esm-collection-spec.md#assets-object

@andersy005
Copy link
Member Author

@wachsylon, I opened an issue for this: #452

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
usage question User questions which do not appear to be bugs or enhancements.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants