-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 259
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inquiry about network interferograms #1284
Comments
To address your inquiry about the selection of interferogram pairs in MintPy, let's delve into the relevant parts of the codebase and documentation that might help clarify the process. Understanding Interferogram Selection in MintPy
Why MintPy Processes Interferograms with Red Solid LinesThe red solid lines in your network plot might indicate interferograms that are processed under specific conditions or criteria set in the configuration files. These could be related to maintaining network connectivity, ensuring sufficient temporal coverage, or meeting specific baseline constraints. Steps to Investigate Further
If you have specific criteria or constraints in mind, you can adjust the configuration files or use the Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect. Current plan usage: 0.00% Have feedback or need help? |
Colors (red/blue) represent the average spatial coherence; while solid and dashed lines represent the kept and excluded/dropped interferograms, as shown in the legend. |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Hello,
Sorry for my poor understanding.
I don't fully understand the selection of the pair of dropped and used interferograms in routine processing.
Is there any explanation for why MintPy still processes interferograms with red solid lines?
Any response is appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: