Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mean velocity result #55

Open
mohseniaref opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Mean velocity result #55

mohseniaref opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@mohseniaref
Copy link

mohseniaref commented Aug 2, 2023

@mirzaees I've got some interesting results of landslide about the fading signal issue. So, I've been doing some experiments and trying out different data processing techniques ? the result seems unexpected . The results from each method are surprisingly similar. What would be the reason?

FigX_MinaPurna_processing_methods (1) (1)

@falkamelung
Copy link
Contributor

I would just use the default. What matters more is the phase-unwrapping network. You may want to try single-reference and delaunay with different options. Masking matters of course.

@mohseniaref
Copy link
Author

@falkamelung Thanks so much for your response. My understanding from [1] is delaunay network is better so I applied that. Then I have time series which is mask according temporal coherence .The western side of the hillslope looks masked in comparision of SBAS which shows high rate of deformation . I applied masked in the following result

Do we expect to end up with a very similar result from the all the phase linking method or they should look different?
To what extend we should expect that deformation rate could decrease while we use same delaunay network? Is deformation rate could decrease more than 1 or 2 cm/yr for some point?

FigX_MinaPurna_processing_methods (3)

1:Mirzaee, S., Amelung, F., Fattahi, H., 2023. Non-linear phase linking using joined distributed and persistent scatterers. Comput Geosci 171, 105291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105291.

@falkamelung
Copy link
Contributor

I would try single-reference network as phase-unwrap errors don't propagate. If you see the same signal as with Delaunay network you can be confident. If different you may want to try different Delaunay networks.

@mohseniaref
Copy link
Author

Thanks once again @falkamelung, what about magnitude of deformation rate? what If I see a signal there but with different magnitude

@mirzaees
Copy link
Collaborator

@mohseniaref, I expect all phase linking techniques have similar results, however the magnitude of deformation rate is slightly different/smaller for sequential mode. please refer to figure 2 in the paper comparing in the simulations.
SBW or SBAS on the other hand, are affected by fading signal and have higher deformation rate where it is present

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants