Overall process of voting #82
Replies: 1 comment
-
There is a description of a possible voting scheme in the paper (which does not use ALBA), and there is also active development of ALBA based schemes. So all the details are not fixed yet.
As I said there a number of options here, and the design has not been finalized yet. E.g. in the scheme proposed in the Leios paper a valid EB certificate needs to have at least k votes, for some fixed k. That is how you determine that an EB has won the election or equivalently that it has been certified. These k votes now may be compressed to a more compact form (let's call this the certificate). When I see an EB with a certificate, by the security properties of the voting scheme, I'm sure that a majority of the stake is supporting this EB and I can safely include it in the ledger. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm still confused about the exact mechanics of voting. How do you decide that an EB has enough votes to get baked into an RB?
I can find descriptions of the security properties we want voting to hold. But what is the voting process which satisfies those properties? How can a collection of a few hundred votes indicate that a "majority of stake" agrees to include an EB? How do EBs "win" elections?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions