-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bandwidth limited to below 10Mbps #33
Comments
What is the speed without extension? |
I can't manage to get unobfuscated wireguard through the handshake, but when I was using a fork called notwireguard, I used to get the full speed. |
I cannot reproduce this problem. Perhaps your ISP is throttling UDP now? Also, have you tried version 0.5? |
I didn't try 0.5 because it was not available on aur, I give it a try and update. |
Same performance on v0.5.0 |
It obfuscates all traffic. How about CPU usage? |
CPU is under 20% while doing the speed test. |
It is not possible to only obfuscate the handshake unless make big changes. Besides, what if other parts of WG traffic also affected? |
The DPI firewalls I deal with only detect the handshake. I will try with other server and see if it improves, thanks for your support. |
I tested it on a ARM single board computer but still cannot reproduce the problem. If possible you can try the latest branch. Also, it might help by setting the wireguard MTU to a lower value. |
Hello
I have managed successfully to use the extension, but my connection is now always below 10Mbps. Server running latest Debian is 100mbps and client running Arch Linux ARM is 70mbps on v0.4.2.
Below is an iperf3 log from testing:
What would be the cause of having such performance loss? I don't think the overhead should be this much.
Thanks for the great extension that helps with Internet censorship.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: