Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add documentation on how the specifications can tackle different NaN options #24

Open
stijnvanhoey opened this issue Oct 2, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Add documentation on how the specifications can tackle different NaN options #24

stijnvanhoey opened this issue Oct 2, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@stijnvanhoey
Copy link
Contributor

The whip syntax does not provide specific rules for handling missing values (question ICEI 2018 conference). However it enables different options using the existing rules. It would be worthwhile to create some examples on how certain missing values decisions can be translated to whip specifications.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@stijnvanhoey