Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Usage of the word 'allowed' #10

Open
cgendreau opened this issue Feb 23, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Usage of the word 'allowed' #10

cgendreau opened this issue Feb 23, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@cgendreau
Copy link

If we look at the current specification types, only allowed is an adjective:

allowed
minlength
maxlength
stringformat
regex
min
max
numberformat
mindate
maxdate
dateformat

That been said, I don't have any super suggestion other than something like simply value or allowedvalue (which is not pretty as one word).

Please treat that as a question/idea/suggestion, I'm not a native English speaker.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

It's worth considering. I do think it is a specification that is originally coming from Cerberus. @stijnvanhoey would know it is useful to stick to that or not.

@stijnvanhoey
Copy link
Contributor

There is no specific reason to stick to the naming of Cerberus, as this is just a possible base to implement the validation of whip-specification files. If there is a good alternative to allowed it is certainly worth to consider and there shouldn't be a technical limitation in terms of implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants