You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was wondering if you had any recommendations for running nextNEOpi on WGS data where one fq.gz file is over 100GB. nextNEOpi has issues with BWA, MarkDuplicates and ReadBackedPhasing. BWA can take even 18-20h; MarkDuplicates 10-15h and ReadBackedPhasing over 20h. For MarkDuplicates I already modified the code to include sort with sambamba instead of samtools because I read it would be faster. I am attaching my process.config and params.config files.
Best wishes,
Magda params.config.txt process.config.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In case you are running the pipeline on a HPC cluster or a machine with many cores you could try to increase the scatter count which might help in some places.
Thanks! Unfortunately, the tasks that take a long time (the three I mentioned) are not parallelised at all so setting the scatter_count to sth higher does not help. Also, because of subdivision-mode of BALANCING_WITHOUT_INTERVAL_SUBDIVISION_WITH_OVERFLOW that is set in gatk SplitIntervals, I end up with 25 intervals only either way.
Hi,
I was wondering if you had any recommendations for running nextNEOpi on WGS data where one fq.gz file is over 100GB. nextNEOpi has issues with BWA, MarkDuplicates and ReadBackedPhasing. BWA can take even 18-20h; MarkDuplicates 10-15h and ReadBackedPhasing over 20h. For MarkDuplicates I already modified the code to include sort with sambamba instead of samtools because I read it would be faster. I am attaching my process.config and params.config files.
Best wishes,
Magda
params.config.txt
process.config.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: