You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to ask how do you draw the end of a reaction (arc) that it is displayed as attached to an element (process or macromolecule). As in the code it states that there is gap between start/end of arc and the element is it attached.
Please see coordiantes of arcs/elements from the attached model:
catalysis end arc is y="314.2858246181238", while process y="317.85714285714283".
There is ~3.5 gap. Is 3.5 the diameter/radius of the circle?
Similar 'gap' is between consumption (arc start x="410.625") and macromolecule A (x="410"="350+60")
macromolecule B (x="655") and production end x="651.25" - the difference 3.75 is the height of the triangle (arrow)?
Please advise how do you define start/end of arc so the ends of arc (with arrow/circle) are directly attached to the element despite the "gap".
There exists a similar issue here. Probably, there are bugs on exporting the end points of some edge types. I am not sure whether there exists a specific pattern for the gap values, this needs further investigation.
Model exported as sbgn from newt here: coords-check.sbgn.zip
I would like to ask how do you draw the end of a reaction (arc) that it is displayed as attached to an element (process or macromolecule). As in the code it states that there is gap between start/end of arc and the element is it attached.
Please see coordiantes of arcs/elements from the attached model:
There is ~3.5 gap. Is 3.5 the diameter/radius of the circle?
Please advise how do you define start/end of arc so the ends of arc (with arrow/circle) are directly attached to the element despite the "gap".
coordinates of my sbgn model:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: