You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've figured I can do a swung/shuffled clock like so:
....C2...
D1..02T98
.$bpm:80.
And this works reasonably well, but I tried this:
D1......
.$bpm:80
and this
D0......
.$bpm:80
Which should produce identical output, but reseting the bpm on each frame results in a slower overall speed. I tested this on v215 Mac sending a midi note each frame to Renoise so otherwise, no noticeable jitter. This short delay might by unavoidable, but being able to do these types of timing manipulations accurately within Orca would be very powerful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I noticed the problem too. I don't think I know of a way to handle this properly at this time.
I've just pushed a little update that tries to address that problem tho, could you have a look and see if that changes anything for you?
Thank you for looking in to this. Your change does help with cpu usage when there is no bpm difference, but I do still see the delay when alternating between two bpms. I'm going to do some more reading about this and see if there's anything I can do.
I've figured I can do a swung/shuffled clock like so:
And this works reasonably well, but I tried this:
and this
Which should produce identical output, but reseting the bpm on each frame results in a slower overall speed. I tested this on v215 Mac sending a midi note each frame to Renoise so otherwise, no noticeable jitter. This short delay might by unavoidable, but being able to do these types of timing manipulations accurately within Orca would be very powerful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: