Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regarding the Quality of Training Results #7

Open
LuXiao0228 opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Regarding the Quality of Training Results #7

LuXiao0228 opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@LuXiao0228
Copy link

When I train with sh_degree=0, the training results are much worse when using taming 3dgs' Rasterizer compared to using the original 3DGS Rasterizer. May I ask if this phenomenon is normal?

@rahul-goel
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi.

I tried this with the bicycle scene until 7K iterations. I see similar metrics. Can you give the steps to replicate your issue?

Rahul

@dingjr7
Copy link

dingjr7 commented Jan 2, 2025

Hi, i tried the 5aef77d and trained the garden for 500 iters. The result is blur and has low psnr compared with gaussian splatting.

@rahul-goel
Copy link
Collaborator

At 500 iterations, densification has not started. The results are expected to be blurry.

Also, at 500 iterations the sigmoid activation should be used for rendering. The default render script has abs activation as default since it is meant to be used after 30K iterations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants