License Clarification

[QuantumPlayDev]

Hiya, this is cool and thanks so much for sharing. Just wanted to clarify license?

[AntGro]

Hi, you would like to know the license of which of the project we list in the README?

[QuantumPlayDev]

Hi, you would like to know the license of which of the project we list in the README?

Thank you very much for your quick reply. I just checked the readme but unfortunately I didn't see the license specified there. Is there any chance to add it to the license section of the repository? Very sorry to take up your time with this, just want to make sure I comply with your licensing!

Have a great day.

[QuantumPlayDev]

It may just be AIRBO, PMDB, SIMMER that appear to missing the licenses. Just realized the repo is utilizing different licenses for the various components.

[AntGro]

AIRBO: @yanglin-jason
PMDB: @kygguo
SIMMER: @aivarsoo

[aivarsoo]

AIRBO: @yanglin-jason PMDB: @kygguo SIMMER: @aivarsoo

Hi, I missed the license for SIMMER, I assumed there was a license for the whole repo. Which license do you think is appropriate for SIMMER? I am happy with any, but I don't think it's my decision :)

[QuantumPlayDev]

Of course you can :-) MIT seems classy

…

On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 15:45, Aivar Sootla ***@***.***> wrote: AIRBO: @yanglin-jason <https://github.com/yanglin-jason> PMDB: @kygguo <https://github.com/kygguo> SIMMER: @aivarsoo <https://github.com/aivarsoo> Hi, I missed the license for SIMMER, I assumed there was a license for the whole repo. Which license do you think is appropriate for SIMMER? I am happy with any, but I don't think it's my decision :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#101 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BI6JLDRP22GCMRP3EH7XU432BJGVPAVCNFSM6AAAAABRO643YSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBUGA4TGMZUGI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[AntGro]

AIRBO: @yanglin-jason PMDB: @kygguo SIMMER: @aivarsoo

Hi, I missed the license for SIMMER, I assumed there was a license for the whole repo. Which license do you think is appropriate for SIMMER? I am happy with any, but I don't think it's my decision :)

Indeed, there should be one license file per project, if the code does not include third party components that were not released under MIT license, then MIT license can ve used.

[aivarsoo]

See #102 for Simmer license PR. I am not sure what language you should use to reflect that the code is based on safety starter agents and safety gym. Please double check

[AntGro]

Could you include the list of third party codes Simmer code is built on? Like including a THIRD PARTY OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE NOTICE.txt file

[aivarsoo]

sorry for the delay! updated PR