Update npm package check-dependency-version-consistency to v4

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
check-dependency-version-consistency	devDependencies	major	3.0.3 -> 4.1.0

---

Release Notes

bmish/check-dependency-version-consistency (check-dependency-version-consistency)

v4.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​617 Allow --dep-type option to be specified with CSV (@​bmish)

📝 Documentation

• #​616 Tweak readme example and CLI help text (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v4.0.0

Compare Source

💥 Breaking Change

• #​609 Use object instead of string to represent package in Node API (@​bmish)
• #​608 Consider optionalDependencies by default (@​bmish)
• #​607 Drop support for Node 14 and Node 19 (@​bmish)
• #​495 Drop support for Node 12 and Node 17 (@​ddzz)

📝 Documentation

• #​611 Show choices in help text for --dep-type (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​610 Update all dependencies (@​bmish)

Committers: 2

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)
• Darius Dzien (@​ddzz)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​605 Add new option --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​606 Add optionalDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​601 Add peerDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​597 Fix publishing issue from v3.2.0 (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​591 Add Node API (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​596 Add some additional npm info to package.json (@​bmish)
• #​594 Harden CI (@​bmish)
• #​595 Test on Node 20 (@​bmish)
• #​593 Enable better TypeScript linting (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​590 pnpm workspace root package should not require name (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​574 Support pnpm workspaces (@​bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​586 Add back error messages when unable to detect workspaces (@​bmish)

📝 Documentation

• #​543 Mention competing offering Yarn Constraints in readme (@​bmish)
• #​544 Mention npm workspaces in readme (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​561 Add Node v19 to CI (@​ddzz)
• #​548 Add CodeQL (@​bmish)

Committers: 2

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)
• Darius Dzien (@​ddzz)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.12%. Comparing base (6aaf3b0) to head (9f3f85a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5045   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   23.12%   23.12%           
=======================================
  Files         561      561           
  Lines       18913    18913           
  Branches     2680     2680           
=======================================
  Hits         4373     4373           
  Misses      14488    14488           
  Partials       52       52           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	72.03% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	100.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.03% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$69.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.571 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.689 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$81.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 637 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.50 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$547 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.46 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$71.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.21 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.07 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}46.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}24.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.25 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph