Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grouped cards in search are not relevant #421

Open
akshaybhalotia opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Grouped cards in search are not relevant #421

akshaybhalotia opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@akshaybhalotia
Copy link

Job cards from the same company are grouped under one, and user has to click to show all. But this behavior is not expected in search, where only the card with the relevant job should show up. Eg. If a company has openings for both iOS and Android developers with the iOS opening being posted after Android, a search for keyword Android would show up the card stack with iOS job as the front card.

@jace
Copy link
Member

jace commented Mar 5, 2018

This should only happen if the iOS job also mentions Android. Do you have an example?

@akshaybhalotia
Copy link
Author

Just a mention of the word in description under What We're Building triggers this: check https://hasjob.co/vebbler.com/xrt2g for example. It appears on Android keyword search currently.
screen shot 2018-03-05 at 3 02 43 pm

@jace
Copy link
Member

jace commented Mar 5, 2018

Our keyword search is based on full-text search, so this is expected behaviour. However:

  1. There is a separate concern with the relevancy of keywords in the job description. We do not have the ability to extract only relevant keywords from the text (whether in an automated or manual fashion). This merits its own ticket.

  2. There is a valid argument for saying keyword search results should not be grouped. If we accept this, we can remove grouping when keywords are used.

@akshaybhalotia
Copy link
Author

Yes, point 2 is what I meant. Will file a separate one for relevancy matching.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants