You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the filters currently provided in this repository is achromatomaly. A user by the name of Chromaphobe recently released their findings (video, transcript & footnotes) about the origin of this term (coined by a single developer) and why it's not blue cone monochromacy, as some sources have suggested.
It's unclear where the filter in this repository was sourced from, but it does line up with Colorjack's, which has since been retracted.
One of the filters currently provided in this repository is achromatomaly. A user by the name of Chromaphobe recently released their findings (video, transcript & footnotes) about the origin of this term (coined by a single developer) and why it's not blue cone monochromacy, as some sources have suggested.
It's unclear where the filter in this repository was sourced from, but it does line up with Colorjack's, which has since been retracted.
Repo value:
0.618, 0.320, 0.062, 0, 0, 0.163, 0.775, 0.062, 0, 0, 0.163, 0.320, 0.516, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
Colorjack's value:
R:[61.8, 32, 6.2], G:[16.3, 77.5, 6.2], B:[16.3, 32.0, 51.6]
With all this in mind, I'm of the opinion that the "achromatomaly" filter should be removed or at the least evaluated further for validity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: