Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validity of achromatomaly #4

Open
blakegearin opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Validity of achromatomaly #4

blakegearin opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@blakegearin
Copy link

One of the filters currently provided in this repository is achromatomaly. A user by the name of Chromaphobe recently released their findings (video, transcript & footnotes) about the origin of this term (coined by a single developer) and why it's not blue cone monochromacy, as some sources have suggested.

It's unclear where the filter in this repository was sourced from, but it does line up with Colorjack's, which has since been retracted.

Repo value: 0.618, 0.320, 0.062, 0, 0, 0.163, 0.775, 0.062, 0, 0, 0.163, 0.320, 0.516, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
Colorjack's value: R:[61.8, 32, 6.2], G:[16.3, 77.5, 6.2], B:[16.3, 32.0, 51.6]

With all this in mind, I'm of the opinion that the "achromatomaly" filter should be removed or at the least evaluated further for validity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant