-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GitAuto: [FEATURE] Add integration tests to Redis
#583
GitAuto: [FEATURE] Add integration tests to Redis
#583
Conversation
|
GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
13777702 | Triggered | Redis Server Password | f7828f2 | docker-compose.yml | View secret |
13768420 | Triggered | Generic Password | acae96f | appveyor.yml | View secret |
13768420 | Triggered | Generic Password | acae96f | appveyor.yml | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate these secrets.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs12:27AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:27AM INF 594 commits scanned.
12:27AM INF scan completed in 701ms
12:27AM INF no leaks found
|
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | |||
using Xunit; |
Check warning
Code scanning / Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
Analyzer 'SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner' threw an exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' with message 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'. Exception occurred with following context: Compilation: srcassembly.dll SyntaxTree: RedisCacheRepositoryTests.cs SyntaxNode: [Fact] public void TestRedisSetAndGet ... [MethodDeclarationSyntax]@[113..212) (6,4)-(10,5) System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at lambda_method191(Closure , Object , SyntaxTree , String , CancellationToken , ReportDiagnostic& ) at StyleCop.Analyzers.Lightup.SyntaxTreeOptionsProviderWrapper.TryGetDiagnosticValue(SyntaxTree tree, String diagnosticId, CancellationToken cancellationToken, ReportDiagnostic& severity) at SonarAnalyzer.Extensions.DiagnosticDescriptorExtensions.IsEnabled(DiagnosticDescriptor descriptor, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext context) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.<>c__DisplayClass18_0.b__0(KeyValuePair2 x) at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.MoveNext() at System.Linq.Lookup2.Create(IEnumerable1 source, Func2 keySelector, IEqualityComparer1 comparer) at System.Linq.GroupedEnumerable2.GetEnumerator() at System.Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator2.MoveNext() at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.ToArray() at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.AnalyzeRoslyn(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner.<>c__DisplayClass9_0.<Initialize>b__1(SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext c) at SonarAnalyzer.AnalysisContext.SonarCompilationStartAnalysisContext.<>c__DisplayClass11_01.b__0(SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext x) at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.<>c__521.<ExecuteSyntaxNodeAction>b__52_0(ValueTuple2 data) at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.ExecuteAndCatchIfThrows_NoLock[TArg](DiagnosticAnalyzer analyzer, Action1 analyze, TArg argument, Nullable1 info, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Suppress the following diagnostics to disable this analyzer: S1944, S2053, S2222, S2259, S2583, S2589, S3329, S3655, S3900, S3949, S3966, S4158, S4347, S5773, S6781 Warning
Exception occurred with following context:
Compilation: srcassembly.dll
SyntaxTree: RedisCacheRepositoryTests.cs
SyntaxNode: [Fact] public void TestRedisSetAndGet ... [MethodDeclarationSyntax]@[113..212) (6,4)-(10,5) System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at lambda_method191(Closure , Object , SyntaxTree , String , CancellationToken , ReportDiagnostic& )
at StyleCop.Analyzers.Lightup.SyntaxTreeOptionsProviderWrapper.TryGetDiagnosticValue(SyntaxTree tree, String diagnosticId, CancellationToken cancellationToken, ReportDiagnostic& severity)
at SonarAnalyzer.Extensions.DiagnosticDescriptorExtensions.IsEnabled(DiagnosticDescriptor descriptor, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext context)
at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.<>c__DisplayClass18_0.b__0(KeyValuePair2 x) at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.MoveNext()
at System.Linq.Lookup2.Create(IEnumerable1 source, Func2 keySelector, IEqualityComparer1 comparer)
at System.Linq.GroupedEnumerable2.GetEnumerator() at System.Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator2.MoveNext()
at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.ToArray() at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.AnalyzeRoslyn(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner.<>c__DisplayClass9_0.<Initialize>b__1(SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext c) at SonarAnalyzer.AnalysisContext.SonarCompilationStartAnalysisContext.<>c__DisplayClass11_01.b__0(SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext x)
at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.<>c__521.<ExecuteSyntaxNodeAction>b__52_0(ValueTuple2 data)
at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.ExecuteAndCatchIfThrows_NoLock[TArg](DiagnosticAnalyzer analyzer, Action1 analyze, TArg argument, Nullable1 info, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Suppress the following diagnostics to disable this analyzer: S1944, S2053, S2222, S2259, S2583, S2589, S3329, S3655, S3900, S3949, S3966, S4158, S4347, S5773, S6781
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
Resolves #543
What is the feature
This feature adds integration tests for Redis to ensure that our application interacts correctly with a real Redis instance. It involves implementing tests in the existing
CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests
project, configuring Redis instances for local development using Docker Compose, and setting up Redis for continuous integration builds in AppVeyor.Why we need the feature
Integration tests are essential to validate that our application correctly communicates with external services like Redis. By testing against a real Redis instance, we can catch issues related to configuration, network communication, and data serialization that unit tests may not cover. This enhances the reliability and robustness of our application and prevents bugs from reaching production.
How to implement and why
The implementation will proceed in the following steps:
Implement Redis Integration Tests in
CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests
:Create Test Class
RedisCacheRepositoryTests
:CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests
project, under the directoryCache/Redis
, create a new test class namedRedisCacheRepositoryTests
.Write Integration Tests:
Configure Redis Instance for Local Development:
Utilize Existing
docker-compose.yml
:docker-compose.yml
file already includes a Redis service, ensure that developers are aware and use it for running Redis locally.Documentation:
Update
appveyor.yml
for Continuous Integration:Configure Redis on AppVeyor:
appveyor.yml
file to include steps that install and start Redis on the CI build machine.Verify Redis Availability:
Maintain Configuration Files:
docker-compose.yml
andappveyor.yml
are Up-to-date:Test Across Environments:
Documentation and Maintenance:
Update README and Documentation:
Add Comments to Configuration Scripts:
appveyor.yml
for clarity.About backward compatibility
This feature is backward compatible. The addition of integration tests and the configuration of Redis instances for testing purposes do not affect existing functionalities. All current interfaces and behaviors remain unchanged. The integration tests enhance the testing suite without modifying any production code, ensuring that existing users and systems are not impacted.
Test these changes locally