Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitAuto: [FEATURE] Add integration tests to Redis #583

Closed

Conversation

gitauto-ai[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Resolves #543

What is the feature

This feature adds integration tests for Redis to ensure that our application interacts correctly with a real Redis instance. It involves implementing tests in the existing CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests project, configuring Redis instances for local development using Docker Compose, and setting up Redis for continuous integration builds in AppVeyor.

Why we need the feature

Integration tests are essential to validate that our application correctly communicates with external services like Redis. By testing against a real Redis instance, we can catch issues related to configuration, network communication, and data serialization that unit tests may not cover. This enhances the reliability and robustness of our application and prevents bugs from reaching production.

How to implement and why

The implementation will proceed in the following steps:

  1. Implement Redis Integration Tests in CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests:

    • Create Test Class RedisCacheRepositoryTests:

      • In the existing CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests project, under the directory Cache/Redis, create a new test class named RedisCacheRepositoryTests.
      • Reason: Organizing tests in this manner maintains a clean project structure and makes the tests easily discoverable.
    • Write Integration Tests:

      • Implement tests that cover various Redis operations such as setting, getting, and deleting cache entries.
      • Include edge cases and error handling scenarios.
      • Reason: Comprehensive tests ensure that all aspects of Redis interactions are validated.
  2. Configure Redis Instance for Local Development:

    • Utilize Existing docker-compose.yml:

      • Since the docker-compose.yml file already includes a Redis service, ensure that developers are aware and use it for running Redis locally.
      • Reason: Using Docker Compose allows for easy setup and teardown of Redis instances, providing a consistent environment for all developers.
    • Documentation:

      • Update the project documentation to guide developers on how to start the Redis service using Docker Compose.
      • Reason: Clear instructions help new and existing team members set up their development environment efficiently.
  3. Update appveyor.yml for Continuous Integration:

    • Configure Redis on AppVeyor:

      • Modify the appveyor.yml file to include steps that install and start Redis on the CI build machine.
      • Use the provided PowerShell script to download, install, and start Redis 5.0.14.
      • Reason: Ensuring that Redis is running during CI builds allows integration tests to execute in the build pipeline, catching issues early.
    • Verify Redis Availability:

      • Add a build step to verify that the Redis server is running before tests are executed.
      • Reason: This ensures that integration tests will not fail due to Redis not being available on the CI server.
  4. Maintain Configuration Files:

    • Ensure docker-compose.yml and appveyor.yml are Up-to-date:
      • Review the existing configuration files to confirm they are correctly set up for Redis.
      • Make any necessary adjustments to port mappings or service configurations.
      • Reason: Accurate configuration files are crucial for the smooth operation of development and CI environments.
  5. Test Across Environments:

    • Local and CI Testing:
      • Run the integration tests locally and in the CI environment to verify that Redis is correctly configured and that the tests pass.
      • Reason: Validating in both environments ensures consistency and reliability.
  6. Documentation and Maintenance:

    • Update README and Documentation:

      • Provide guidelines on running integration tests and managing the Redis instance.
      • Reason: Helps maintain the project and assists future developers in understanding the setup.
    • Add Comments to Configuration Scripts:

      • Comment the steps in appveyor.yml for clarity.
      • Reason: Improves maintainability of the CI configuration.

About backward compatibility

This feature is backward compatible. The addition of integration tests and the configuration of Redis instances for testing purposes do not affect existing functionalities. All current interfaces and behaviors remain unchanged. The integration tests enhance the testing suite without modifying any production code, ensuring that existing users and systems are not impacted.

Test these changes locally

git checkout -b gitauto/issue-543-729116dd-a8fa-48a5-a324-12d8e0662e91
git pull origin gitauto/issue-543-729116dd-a8fa-48a5-a324-12d8e0662e91

Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Oct 25, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 3 secrets following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secrets in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
13777702 Triggered Redis Server Password f7828f2 docker-compose.yml View secret
13768420 Triggered Generic Password acae96f appveyor.yml View secret
13768420 Triggered Generic Password acae96f appveyor.yml View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate these secrets.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs
12:27AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:27AM INF 594 commits scanned.
12:27AM INF scan completed in 701ms
12:27AM INF no leaks found

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
using Xunit;

Check warning

Code scanning / Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)

Analyzer 'SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner' threw an exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' with message 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'. Exception occurred with following context: Compilation: srcassembly.dll SyntaxTree: RedisCacheRepositoryTests.cs SyntaxNode: [Fact] public void TestRedisSetAndGet ... [MethodDeclarationSyntax]@[113..212) (6,4)-(10,5) System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at lambda_method191(Closure , Object , SyntaxTree , String , CancellationToken , ReportDiagnostic& ) at StyleCop.Analyzers.Lightup.SyntaxTreeOptionsProviderWrapper.TryGetDiagnosticValue(SyntaxTree tree, String diagnosticId, CancellationToken cancellationToken, ReportDiagnostic& severity) at SonarAnalyzer.Extensions.DiagnosticDescriptorExtensions.IsEnabled(DiagnosticDescriptor descriptor, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext context) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.<>c__DisplayClass18_0.b__0(KeyValuePair2 x) at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.MoveNext() at System.Linq.Lookup2.Create(IEnumerable1 source, Func2 keySelector, IEqualityComparer1 comparer) at System.Linq.GroupedEnumerable2.GetEnumerator() at System.Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator2.MoveNext() at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.ToArray() at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.AnalyzeRoslyn(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner.<>c__DisplayClass9_0.<Initialize>b__1(SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext c) at SonarAnalyzer.AnalysisContext.SonarCompilationStartAnalysisContext.<>c__DisplayClass11_01.b__0(SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext x) at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.<>c__521.<ExecuteSyntaxNodeAction>b__52_0(ValueTuple2 data) at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.ExecuteAndCatchIfThrows_NoLock[TArg](DiagnosticAnalyzer analyzer, Action1 analyze, TArg argument, Nullable1 info, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Suppress the following diagnostics to disable this analyzer: S1944, S2053, S2222, S2259, S2583, S2589, S3329, S3655, S3900, S3949, S3966, S4158, S4347, S5773, S6781 Warning

Analyzer 'SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner' threw an exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' with message 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'.
Exception occurred with following context:
Compilation: srcassembly.dll
SyntaxTree: RedisCacheRepositoryTests.cs
SyntaxNode: [Fact] public void TestRedisSetAndGet ... [MethodDeclarationSyntax]@[113..212) (6,4)-(10,5) System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at lambda_method191(Closure , Object , SyntaxTree , String , CancellationToken , ReportDiagnostic& )
at StyleCop.Analyzers.Lightup.SyntaxTreeOptionsProviderWrapper.TryGetDiagnosticValue(SyntaxTree tree, String diagnosticId, CancellationToken cancellationToken, ReportDiagnostic& severity)
at SonarAnalyzer.Extensions.DiagnosticDescriptorExtensions.IsEnabled(DiagnosticDescriptor descriptor, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext context)
at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.<>c__DisplayClass18_0.b__0(KeyValuePair2 x) at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.MoveNext()
at System.Linq.Lookup2.Create(IEnumerable1 source, Func2 keySelector, IEqualityComparer1 comparer)
at System.Linq.GroupedEnumerable2.GetEnumerator() at System.Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator2.MoveNext()
at System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator1.ToArray() at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.AnalyzeRoslyn(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext, ISymbol symbol) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.SymbolicExecutionRunnerBase.Analyze(SonarAnalysisContext analysisContext, SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext nodeContext) at SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp.SymbolicExecutionRunner.<>c__DisplayClass9_0.<Initialize>b__1(SonarSyntaxNodeReportingContext c) at SonarAnalyzer.AnalysisContext.SonarCompilationStartAnalysisContext.<>c__DisplayClass11_01.b__0(SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext x)
at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.<>c__521.<ExecuteSyntaxNodeAction>b__52_0(ValueTuple2 data)
at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerExecutor.ExecuteAndCatchIfThrows_NoLock[TArg](DiagnosticAnalyzer analyzer, Action1 analyze, TArg argument, Nullable1 info, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Suppress the following diagnostics to disable this analyzer: S1944, S2053, S2222, S2259, S2583, S2589, S3329, S3655, S3900, S3949, S3966, S4158, S4347, S5773, S6781
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added .NET Pull requests that update .net code cache communications enhancement New feature or request gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event help wanted Extra attention is needed Redis tests Tests ⚙️ CI/CD Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment processes 🎲 database Database-related operations 📝 documentation Tasks related to writing or updating documentation labels Oct 25, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from guibranco October 25, 2024 00:29
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations labels Oct 25, 2024
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-0.03% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (f40893e) 3874 1639 42.31%
Head commit (88da33b) 3874 (+0) 1638 (-1) 42.28% (-0.03%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#583) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@guibranco guibranco closed this Nov 12, 2024
@guibranco guibranco deleted the gitauto/issue-543-729116dd-a8fa-48a5-a324-12d8e0662e91 branch November 12, 2024 20:04
@guibranco guibranco removed the 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization label Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations cache ⚙️ CI/CD Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment processes communications 🎲 database Database-related operations 📝 documentation Tasks related to writing or updating documentation enhancement New feature or request gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event help wanted Extra attention is needed .NET Pull requests that update .net code Redis size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. tests Tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE] Add integration tests to Redis
1 participant