Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Level 1 and 2 cluster #25

Open
tthye1 opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Level 1 and 2 cluster #25

tthye1 opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@tthye1
Copy link

tthye1 commented Jan 5, 2024

Hi Gerry,

I work on a project with about 200 Campylobacter isolates. I have created SNP based and cgMLST based distance matrices and phylogenies and clustered the isolates with fastbaps and hierCC.
My question is how the fastbaps level 1 and 2 compare to the levels of the multi-clustering scheme of hierCC software used by Enterobase. Are they comparable, and which software works best for which data set (SNPs or cgMLST alleles)?

Best,

Thorsten

@gtonkinhill
Copy link
Owner

Hi Thorsten,

I'm afraid I don't have a lot of experience with hierCC so I'm not sure exactly how it compares. I mostly use SNP data when running fastbaps although it should work with cgMLST as well.

In terms of running fastbaps, it's often worth considering the choice of prior used in the algorithm. This can go from conservative (less clusters) using the 'symmetric' prior up to more sensitive (more clusters) using the 'optimised.baps' prior which is tailored to each dataset. If you have a phylogeny you are confident in you could also consider conditioning on the tree which will ensure that all clusters are consistent with the phylogeny.

@tthye1
Copy link
Author

tthye1 commented Jan 9, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants