Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redundant spiflash and spi-flash commands #391

Open
meeas opened this issue Aug 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Redundant spiflash and spi-flash commands #391

meeas opened this issue Aug 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement potential new feature

Comments

@meeas
Copy link

meeas commented Aug 22, 2021

Any reason why we need both? Based on the other compound word commands, it seem to make the most sense to keep spi-flash and remove spiflash.

@straithe straithe added the enhancement potential new feature label Aug 23, 2021
@straithe
Copy link
Member

Thank you for pointing this out! I will make sure this gets reviewed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement potential new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants