You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Often we use tricks like select n and increment the number or change current.sql in another way to get it to run.
It would be handy to have a flag to force run --once if the file hasn't changed.
Motivating example
When testing a data migration, it is often very handy to have an idempotent migration that can get run multiple times as you add/change data in your application.
Typical workflow for me in a data migration involves
Keep the original data I am moving in place (if possible)
Run the migration, check for base functionality, compare against existing
Add more data to test the migration and run it again (rinse and repeat as needed)
Once tested, add code to cleanup the original data, test again, and ship
Though workarounds are simple as described in the feature description, I think it would be a nice add.
Breaking changes
n/a
Supporting development
I [tick all that apply]:
am interested in building this feature myself
am interested in collaborating on building this feature
[ x ] am willing to help testing this feature before it's released
am willing to write a test-driven test suite for this feature (before it exists)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
zacherkkila
changed the title
Allow force running of --once, even if no migration is necessary
Allow force running of --once if current.sql has not changed
Feb 29, 2024
Which is useful to disable in both watch and watch --once modes.
Maybe --always-different (-a) or --no-ignore-unchanged or --no-require-changes or similar might make sense? --force (-f) also makes sense, but it's a bit less specific and limits our future options, perhaps. A --force-when-unchanged flag that --force automatically enables might make sense... but we'd need some more forces (--force-actions) first.
Feature description
Often we use tricks like
select n
and increment the number or changecurrent.sql
in another way to get it to run.It would be handy to have a flag to force run
--once
if the file hasn't changed.Motivating example
When testing a data migration, it is often very handy to have an idempotent migration that can get run multiple times as you add/change data in your application.
Typical workflow for me in a data migration involves
Though workarounds are simple as described in the feature description, I think it would be a nice add.
Breaking changes
n/a
Supporting development
I [tick all that apply]:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: