Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support multiple service names per port #328

Open
djMax opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #660
Open

Support multiple service names per port #328

djMax opened this issue Jan 27, 2016 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #660

Comments

@djMax
Copy link

djMax commented Jan 27, 2016

Perhaps this is already possible, I'm new to registrator. But I want to have multiple services (postgreslogicaldb1, postgreslogicaldb2 for example) hosted on a single container/port. i.e. in the dev case I shove the DBs on the same postgres host, but I don't want to do that in prod. Is this possible?

@francuesta
Copy link

+1
In our architecture design, a container can expose several services in the same port.
Maybe SERVICE_NAME environment variable can take multiple values?

@jonathannegrin
Copy link

+1 for this

@mandragorn
Copy link

+1 for this, We have a legacy app and have started breaking it apart into microservices. It would ease our transition if we could treat the legacy as multiple microservices since it deploys multiple services in a single docker container.

@dermyrddin
Copy link

Also need this feature

@vultron81
Copy link

+1

@josegonzalez
Copy link
Member

If someone wants to work on the feature, great! registrator is a community project, so this won't get done without your support.

@mbrioschi
Copy link

+1

@josegonzalez
Copy link
Member

If you'd like this functionality, please consider implementing it or sponsoring the work to implement this. Feel free to reach out to me if interested in the latter.

@pelletier pelletier linked a pull request Apr 25, 2019 that will close this issue
@pelletier
Copy link

pelletier commented Apr 25, 2019

Gave this a shot: #660 @josegonzalez

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

9 participants