[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Report - February 13, 2026

[github-actions[bot]]

🏷️ Auto-Triage Summary

Report Period: February 13, 2026 13:25 UTC
Issues Processed: 4
Labels Applied: 8 total labels
Still Unlabeled: 0 remaining (100% success rate)

Key Metrics

• Success Rate: 100% (all unlabeled issues successfully classified)
• Average Confidence: High
• Most Common Classifications: automation (4), testing (2), documentation (1), refactoring (1)

Classification Summary

Issue	Title	Applied Labels	Confidence	Key Reasoning
#15401	Smoke Test: Copilot - 21988086692	testing, automation	High	Automated smoke test report with test results table
#15399	Smoke Copilot - Issue Group	testing, automation	High	Parent issue for grouping smoke test results
#15387	Developer Documentation Consolidation - 2026-02-13	documentation, automation	High	Automated documentation analysis and consolidation report
#15382	🔤 Typist - Go Type Consistency Analysis Report	refactoring, automation	High	Go code type consistency analysis for refactoring opportunities

View Detailed Classification Analysis

Issue #15401: Smoke Test Report

Keywords Detected: "Test Results", "GitHub MCP", "Safe Inputs", "Playwright", "Testing"
Pattern Match: Automated test report with status table (✅/❌ indicators)
Similar Issues: Other smoke test reports in the repository
Confidence Score: 95%

Classification Rationale:

• Clear testing context with test suite results
• Automated workflow-generated report
• Fits testing + automation pattern

Issue #15399: Smoke Copilot Group Issue

Keywords Detected: "Issue Group", "Smoke Copilot", "Parent issue", "Sub-issues"
Pattern Match: Parent issue for organizing related test results
Similar Issues: Other workflow grouping issues (#15386, #15379)
Confidence Score: 90%

Classification Rationale:

• Organizational issue for smoke test workflow
• Part of testing infrastructure
• Automated workflow pattern

Issue #15387: Developer Documentation Consolidation

Keywords Detected: "Documentation Consolidation", "markdown files", "scratchpad", "formatting issues"
Pattern Match: Automated documentation analysis report
Similar Issues: Documentation-related workflow reports
Confidence Score: 95%

Classification Rationale:

• Explicitly about documentation analysis
• Automated consolidation workflow
• Fixed markdown formatting issues in documentation

Issue #15382: Go Type Consistency Analysis

Keywords Detected: "Type Consistency", "Go source files", "refactoring", "type safety"
Pattern Match: Code analysis report identifying refactoring opportunities
Similar Issues: Other code quality analysis reports (#15384 - testify expert)
Confidence Score: 90%

Classification Rationale:

• Identifies type consistency opportunities for refactoring
• Automated code analysis workflow
• Focuses on code improvements and refactoring patterns

Label Distribution

View Label Statistics

• automation: 4 issues (100% of processed) - All issues were generated by automated workflows
• testing: 2 issues (50% of processed) - Smoke test reports and grouping
• documentation: 1 issue (25% of processed) - Documentation consolidation
• refactoring: 1 issue (25% of processed) - Type consistency analysis

Label Application Pattern: Every issue received the automation label since all were workflow-generated reports. Additional labels were applied based on the specific domain (testing, documentation, refactoring).

Triage Insights

Pattern Observed: The majority of unlabeled issues in this period were automated workflow reports. This suggests that:

1. Automated workflows are creating issues without pre-applied labels
2. There's an opportunity to enhance workflows to auto-apply labels at creation time
3. Most workflow-generated issues follow consistent patterns that make triage straightforward

Already-Labeled Issues: During the search, encountered many issues that were already properly labeled:

• CI Failure Doctor reports: Labeled with cookie
• Workflow Health reports: Labeled with workflow-health, priority-p0, type-maintenance
• PR Triage reports: Labeled with automated, triage-report
• Agentic workflow failures: Labeled with agentic-workflows

This indicates that many workflows are already applying labels correctly.

Recommendations

Immediate Actions

1. Enhance Workflow Label Application:

   • Update smoke test workflows to auto-apply testing, automation labels
   • Update documentation consolidation workflow to auto-apply documentation, automation labels
   • Update type analysis workflow to auto-apply refactoring, automation labels

2. Pattern Recognition Success: The consistent pattern of automated reports made triage very efficient with high confidence scores (90-95%).

Medium-term Improvements

1. Standardize Workflow Labels: Create a convention for workflows to apply labels when creating issues
2. Monitor Unlabeled Rate: Track the percentage of unlabeled issues over time (current snapshot shows good coverage)
3. Label Templates: Document recommended labels for each workflow type in workflow documentation

Confidence Assessment

• Overall Success: High - All 4 issues successfully classified with appropriate labels
• Human Review Needed: 0 issues flagged with needs-triage
• Classification Quality: All issues had clear indicators making classification straightforward
• Next Steps: Consider workflow improvements to auto-apply labels at issue creation time

Statistics

Compared to Repository State:

• Target: Reduce unlabeled issues from 8.6% to <5%
• Current Run: 100% success rate on processed issues
• Impact: 4 fewer unlabeled issues in the repository
• Trend: Good label coverage for most workflow-generated issues

Historical Context

This triage run focused on recently created issues (created within the last ~1.5 hours). The search revealed:

• Unlabeled issues found: 4 (all successfully labeled)
• Already-labeled issues: Majority of recent issues already had appropriate labels
• Quality indicator: Most automated workflows are applying labels correctly

---

Auto-Triage Issues workflow run: §21988452303

AI generated by Auto-Triage Issues

• expires on Feb 20, 2026, 1:30 PM UTC