You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The gh-aw repository demonstrates excellent engineering practices with a quality score of 80.0/100. The codebase contains 797,252 total lines across 2,883 files, with Go (51%) and Markdown (20%) as primary languages. Test coverage is exceptional at 2.35x source-to-test ratio, with 924 test files covering 287,083 lines. The repository shows healthy growth with a 2.2% LOC increase over the last 7 days, while documentation maintains an excellent code-to-docs ratio of 0.14:1.
Activity levels are notably high, with 756 source files modified and 396 commits in the last 7 days. The quality score breakdown reveals strengths in test coverage (30/30) and documentation (20/20), with opportunities for improvement in churn stability (5/15) due to active development, and comment density (5/10) which could be enhanced to reach the 20% target. Overall, the codebase exhibits strong health indicators with systematic tracking and improvement potential in code documentation practices.
📊 Visualizations
LOC Distribution by Language
The codebase is predominantly Go (51.3%) at 409,291 lines, reflecting a backend-focused architecture. Markdown documentation comprises 20.3% (161,886 lines), indicating strong documentation practices. YAML configuration files (23.1%) support extensive workflow automation with 208 workflow definitions.
Top Directories by LOC
The docs/ directory dominates at 53.3% (895,195 lines), showcasing comprehensive documentation. The pkg/ directory contains 425,182 lines (53.3% of code), indicating well-organized package structure. Workflow definitions in .github/workflows/ comprise 14.2% (239,109 lines), reflecting extensive CI/CD automation.
Quality Score Breakdown
Overall Score: 80.0/100
The quality score demonstrates excellent performance in testing and documentation, with room for improvement in code activity and commenting:
Test Coverage (30/30): Perfect score - 2.35x test-to-source ratio far exceeds the 1.0x target
Code Organization (20/25): Good - 202 large files (>500 LOC) represent 7% of codebase
Churn Stability (5/15): High activity - 756 files (26% of codebase) modified in last 7 days indicates active development
Comment Density (5/10): Moderate - 10% comment ratio is half the recommended 20% target
Test Coverage Analysis
Outstanding test coverage with 287,083 test lines covering 122,208 source lines, yielding a 2.35:1 ratio. This exceeds the recommended 1.0x target and demonstrates strong commitment to code quality. The test-to-source ratio declined 6.34% over 7 days, likely due to rapid feature development, but remains at excellent levels.
Code Churn (Last 7 Days)
High development activity with 756 source files modified (excluding generated .lock.yml files). Top changed files include:
Note: Lock file churn is reported separately and excluded from quality score calculations to avoid noise from generated files.
Workflow Metrics
Total Workflow Files (.md): 208 files
Compiled Workflows (.lock.yml): 148 files
Average Workflow Size: 258 lines
Growth (7d): ⬆️ +2.2%
Documentation
Doc Files (docs/): 115 Markdown files
Doc LOC: 895,195 lines
Code-to-Docs Ratio: 0.14:1 ✅ (excellent)
Documentation Coverage: Comprehensive across all features
Quality Score: 80.0/100
Component Breakdown
Test Coverage (30%): 30.0/30 points ✅ Perfect
Code Organization (25%): 20.0/25 points ⚠️ Good
Documentation (20%): 20.0/20 points ✅ Perfect
Churn Stability (15%): 5.0/15 points ⚠️ High activity
Comment Density (10%): 5.0/10 points ⚠️ Moderate
💡 Insights & Recommendations
Maintain Exceptional Test Coverage: The 2.35:1 test-to-source ratio is outstanding. Continue prioritizing test development alongside feature work to maintain this excellent standard.
Improve Comment Density: Current 10% comment ratio is half the recommended 20% target. Focus on adding inline comments for complex logic, especially in workflow compilation and orchestration code where the top churn files indicate active development.
Monitor Code Churn: With 26% of the codebase modified in 7 days (756 files), ensure that rapid development maintains code quality. The focus on test files in churn indicates good practices, but review large files (202 files >500 LOC) for potential modularization.
Leverage Strong Documentation Foundation: The 0.14:1 code-to-docs ratio is exceptional. Continue this practice for new features, and consider using the documentation to guide inline commenting standards.
Optimize Quality Score Balance: While test coverage and documentation are perfect, improving comment density (+5 points) and managing churn patterns (+10 points) could push the quality score toward 95/100.
Report generated by Daily Code Metrics workflow on 2026-02-12 Historical data: 16 entries (30-day tracking) | Workflow run: §21943971004
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The gh-aw repository demonstrates excellent engineering practices with a quality score of 80.0/100. The codebase contains 797,252 total lines across 2,883 files, with Go (51%) and Markdown (20%) as primary languages. Test coverage is exceptional at 2.35x source-to-test ratio, with 924 test files covering 287,083 lines. The repository shows healthy growth with a 2.2% LOC increase over the last 7 days, while documentation maintains an excellent code-to-docs ratio of 0.14:1.
Activity levels are notably high, with 756 source files modified and 396 commits in the last 7 days. The quality score breakdown reveals strengths in test coverage (30/30) and documentation (20/20), with opportunities for improvement in churn stability (5/15) due to active development, and comment density (5/10) which could be enhanced to reach the 20% target. Overall, the codebase exhibits strong health indicators with systematic tracking and improvement potential in code documentation practices.
📊 Visualizations
LOC Distribution by Language
The codebase is predominantly Go (51.3%) at 409,291 lines, reflecting a backend-focused architecture. Markdown documentation comprises 20.3% (161,886 lines), indicating strong documentation practices. YAML configuration files (23.1%) support extensive workflow automation with 208 workflow definitions.
Top Directories by LOC
The
docs/directory dominates at 53.3% (895,195 lines), showcasing comprehensive documentation. Thepkg/directory contains 425,182 lines (53.3% of code), indicating well-organized package structure. Workflow definitions in.github/workflows/comprise 14.2% (239,109 lines), reflecting extensive CI/CD automation.Quality Score Breakdown
Overall Score: 80.0/100
The quality score demonstrates excellent performance in testing and documentation, with room for improvement in code activity and commenting:
Test Coverage Analysis
Outstanding test coverage with 287,083 test lines covering 122,208 source lines, yielding a 2.35:1 ratio. This exceeds the recommended 1.0x target and demonstrates strong commitment to code quality. The test-to-source ratio declined 6.34% over 7 days, likely due to rapid feature development, but remains at excellent levels.
Code Churn (Last 7 Days)
High development activity with 756 source files modified (excluding generated
.lock.ymlfiles). Top changed files include:The focus on test files and documentation in the churn list indicates quality-focused development practices.
Historical Trends (30 Days)
The 30-day trend analysis shows:
📈 Detailed Metrics
Size Metrics
Lines of Code by Language
Total: 797,252 lines across 2,883 files
Lines of Code by Directory
Note: Percentages > 100% indicate directory overlap or file counting methodology
Quality Indicators
Test Coverage
Code Churn (Last 7 Days)
Source Code Churn (Excludes *.lock.yml)
Most Active Source Files
Workflow Lock File Churn (*.lock.yml only)
Note: Lock file churn is reported separately and excluded from quality score calculations to avoid noise from generated files.
Workflow Metrics
Documentation
Quality Score: 80.0/100
Component Breakdown
💡 Insights & Recommendations
Maintain Exceptional Test Coverage: The 2.35:1 test-to-source ratio is outstanding. Continue prioritizing test development alongside feature work to maintain this excellent standard.
Improve Comment Density: Current 10% comment ratio is half the recommended 20% target. Focus on adding inline comments for complex logic, especially in workflow compilation and orchestration code where the top churn files indicate active development.
Monitor Code Churn: With 26% of the codebase modified in 7 days (756 files), ensure that rapid development maintains code quality. The focus on test files in churn indicates good practices, but review large files (202 files >500 LOC) for potential modularization.
Leverage Strong Documentation Foundation: The 0.14:1 code-to-docs ratio is exceptional. Continue this practice for new features, and consider using the documentation to guide inline commenting standards.
Optimize Quality Score Balance: While test coverage and documentation are perfect, improving comment density (+5 points) and managing churn patterns (+10 points) could push the quality score toward 95/100.
Report generated by Daily Code Metrics workflow on 2026-02-12
Historical data: 16 entries (30-day tracking) | Workflow run: §21943971004
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions