[nlp-analysis] Copilot PR Conversation NLP Analysis - 2026-02-12

[github-actions[bot]]

Analysis Period: Last 24 hours (Feb 11-12, 2026)
Repository: github/gh-aw
Total PRs Analyzed: 53 merged PRs
Total Tokens: 8,456 from PR titles and bodies
Average Sentiment: +0.066 (slightly positive, on scale -1 to +1)

---

Sentiment Analysis

Overall Sentiment Distribution

Key Findings:

• Positive PRs: 17 (32%) - PRs with constructive, solution-oriented language
• Neutral PRs: 33 (62%) - Technical descriptions without strong sentiment
• Negative PRs: 3 (6%) - PRs addressing bugs, issues, or problems
• Average polarity: +0.066 (slightly positive overall tone)

The predominance of neutral sentiment (62%) indicates that Copilot PRs maintain a professional, technical focus. The 6:1 ratio of positive to negative PRs suggests that most changes are feature additions or improvements rather than bug fixes.

Sentiment Over Time

Observations:

• Sentiment remains relatively stable throughout the 24-hour period with a slight positive bias
• The 5-PR rolling average (blue line) shows consistent sentiment around +0.05 to +0.15
• No significant sentiment crashes or spikes, indicating steady, quality contributions
• Early morning hours (UTC) show slightly more positive sentiment

Sentiment by Time of Day

Temporal Patterns:

• Night hours (00:00-06:00 UTC): 13 PRs, moderately positive sentiment
• Morning hours (06:00-12:00 UTC): 6 PRs, highest sentiment variability
• Afternoon hours (12:00-18:00 UTC): 14 PRs, consistently positive
• Evening hours (18:00-00:00 UTC): 13 PRs, steady neutral-positive sentiment

Most PR activity occurs in afternoon and evening hours, with afternoon PRs showing the most consistently positive sentiment.

---

Topic Analysis

Identified Discussion Topics

Major Topics Detected (via K-means clustering on TF-IDF features):

1. Topic 4: Workflow Configuration (18 PRs, 34%): Focused on workflow setup, detection, and configuration

   • Key terms: workflow, for, set, detection, with
   • Analysis: Largest cluster, indicating significant focus on workflow infrastructure

2. Topic 3: CLI & GitHub Actions (15 PRs, 28%): Related to gh-aw CLI and workflow operations

   • Key terms: gh, workflow, details, aw, gh aw
   • Analysis: Core functionality updates and CLI improvements

3. Topic 2: Documentation & Testing (11 PRs, 21%): Documentation updates and test coverage

   • Key terms: temporary, your, schema, documentation, test
   • Analysis: Focus on improving developer experience and code quality

4. Topic 1: Environment & Files (9 PRs, 17%): Environment setup and file management

   • Key terms: environment, docs, files, with, for
   • Analysis: Infrastructure and setup improvements

Insight: The dominant focus (62%) is on workflow configuration and CLI functionality, showing Copilot's emphasis on core platform capabilities.

Topic Word Cloud

The word cloud visualization shows the relative importance of terms across all PR content. The prominence of "copilot", "agent", and "coding" reflects the project's focus on agentic workflows and AI-powered development tools.

---

Keyword Trends

Most Common Keywords and Phrases

Top Recurring Terms:

Technical Focus (most frequent):

• copilot (222 occurrences) - Central to all PR descriptions
• agent (197 occurrences) - Agentic workflow emphasis
• workflow (59 occurrences) - GitHub Actions integration
• field (65 occurrences) - Data structure modifications

Action-Oriented (verbs and process terms):

• coding (147 occurrences) - Active development work
• start (109 occurrences) - Initialization and setup
• change (74 occurrences) - Modification and updates
• run (59 occurrences) - Execution and testing
• updated (52 occurrences) - Incremental improvements

Documentation & Quality:

• detail (96 occurrences) - Thorough explanations
• summary (94 occurrences) - Clear overviews
• test (67 occurrences) - Testing coverage
• tip (70 occurrences) - Helpful guidance

Communication Patterns:

• prompt (63 occurrences) - Original task descriptions
• original (67 occurrences) - Reference to source requirements

Top Bigrams (2-word phrases):

• "coding agent" (147) - Strong emphasis on agent functionality
• "copilot coding" (135) - Platform identity
• "agent tips" (70) - Guidance and best practices
• "original prompt" (54) - Traceability to requirements

---

Content Patterns & Insights

🔍 Key Observations

1. Consistent PR Structure: Most PRs follow a structured format with summary, changes, and Copilot coding agent tips sections. This standardization aids in automated processing and human review.

2. High Technical Density: Average of 159.5 tokens per PR body (excluding stopwords and technical noise), indicating comprehensive, detailed descriptions.

3. Traceability Focus: Frequent references to "original prompt" (63 occurrences) show strong connection between user requests and implemented solutions.

4. Quality Emphasis: Terms like "test" (67), "detail" (96), and "summary" (94) indicate focus on thorough, well-documented changes.

5. Proactive Guidance: "agent tips" (70 occurrences) and "tip" (70) show that PRs include helpful guidance for future development.

📊 Communication Style Analysis

Characteristics of Copilot PR Language:

• Structured: Clear sections (summary, changes, tips)
• Technical: Focus on implementation details and configuration
• Educational: Includes tips and guidance for developers
• Traceable: Links back to original prompts and requirements
• Action-oriented: Emphasizes what was done and how to use it

Vocabulary Insights:

• 1,490 unique tokens across 53 PRs = diverse technical vocabulary
• Most common terms are project-specific (copilot, agent, workflow) rather than generic programming terms
• Balanced use of action verbs (start, change, run, update) indicating iterative development

---

PR Highlights

Most Positive PR 😊

PR #14992: Recompile workflows after ProjectOps documentation updates
Sentiment: +0.391 (strongly positive)
Summary: Documentation-focused PR with clear benefits and systematic approach to ensuring workflow consistency after doc changes.

Most Discussed PR 💬

PR #14940: Add per-user per-workflow rate limiting with automatic event inference
Token Count: 463 tokens
Summary: Comprehensive feature addition with detailed explanation of rate limiting implementation, inference logic, and usage patterns. Demonstrates thorough documentation of complex features.

Most Technical PR 🔧

PR #14980: [WIP] Update compile command to show failed workflow IDs
Sentiment: -0.275 (most negative, though still mild)
Summary: Work-in-progress PR focused on improving error reporting. Negative sentiment reflects problem-solving context rather than quality issues.

---

Historical Context

Comparing today's analysis with previous day (Feb 11, 2026):

Metric	Feb 12 (Today)	Feb 11 (Previous)	Change
PRs Merged	53	40	+13 (+33%)
Avg Sentiment	+0.066	+0.117	-0.051 (-44%)
Positive PRs	17 (32%)	23 (58%)	-6 PRs (-26 pp)
Neutral PRs	33 (62%)	15 (38%)	+18 PRs (+24 pp)
Negative PRs	3 (6%)	2 (5%)	+1 PR (+1 pp)

Trend Analysis:

📈 Volume Increase: 33% more PRs merged today vs. yesterday, indicating higher activity

📉 Sentiment Shift: Sentiment decreased from +0.117 to +0.066, though still positive. This shift is driven by:

• Increase in neutral, technical PRs (workflow configuration, infrastructure)
• Slight increase in problem-solving PRs (bug fixes, WIP items)
• More complex features requiring detailed technical descriptions

🎯 Focus Change: Today's PRs show stronger emphasis on workflow infrastructure (Topic 4: 34%) compared to broader feature distribution yesterday

7-Day Context: The sentiment remains consistently positive over the past 2 days (+0.066 to +0.117 range), indicating stable, quality-focused development. The higher PR volume suggests increased productivity while maintaining professional communication standards.

---

Recommendations

Based on NLP analysis of the past 24 hours:

🎯 Continue Strengths

1. Structured PR Format: The consistent use of summary, changes, and tips sections makes PRs easy to review and understand. Continue this pattern.

2. Traceability Practice: References to "original prompt" (54 occurrences) provide excellent context. This helps reviewers understand the intent behind changes.

3. Educational Content: Including "agent tips" and guidance for developers adds long-term value beyond the immediate code change.

⚠️ Areas to Monitor

1. Sentiment Decline: Today's average sentiment (+0.066) is lower than yesterday (+0.117). While still positive, the 44% decrease suggests more technical/problem-focused work:

   • Action: Monitor if this continues over multiple days. Consider if PRs are becoming too problem-focused vs. solution-focused in their language.

2. High Neutral Content: 62% neutral sentiment indicates very technical language. While appropriate for code changes, consider:

   • Action: Could some PRs benefit from highlighting positive impacts or benefits more explicitly?

3. WIP PRs in Production: One PR marked [WIP] with negative sentiment (-0.275) was merged:

   • Action: Clarify WIP merge policies or update PR titles before merge to reflect completion status.

✨ Enhancement Opportunities

1. Topic Diversity: 34% of PRs focus on workflow configuration (Topic 4). Consider:

   • Action: Balance infrastructure work with user-facing features to maintain diverse contribution patterns.

2. Keyword Patterns: High frequency of "coding agent" (147) and "copilot coding" (135) phrases:

   • Action: These terms could be standardized or linked to documentation to ensure consistent understanding.

3. Temporal Optimization: Afternoon PRs show most consistent positive sentiment:

   • Insight: Schedule complex or sensitive PRs during afternoon hours (UTC) when sentiment patterns are most favorable.

---

Methodology

NLP Techniques Applied:

• Sentiment Analysis: TextBlob polarity scoring (-1 to +1 scale)
• Topic Modeling: TF-IDF vectorization with K-means clustering (k=4)
• Keyword Extraction: Token frequency analysis with stopword filtering and lemmatization
• Text Preprocessing: Markdown removal, URL filtering, lowercasing, tokenization, lemmatization

Data Sources:

• 53 merged Copilot-authored PRs (Feb 11-12, 2026)
• PR titles and body text (147k characters total)
• Temporal metadata (creation time, merge time)

Libraries Used:

• NLTK: Natural language processing (tokenization, stopwords, lemmatization)
• scikit-learn: TF-IDF vectorization and K-means clustering
• TextBlob: Sentiment polarity analysis
• WordCloud: Term frequency visualization
• Pandas/NumPy: Data processing and statistical analysis
• Matplotlib/Seaborn: High-quality data visualization

Note on Data Availability: This analysis focuses on PR title and body text. The pre-downloaded comment data was mostly empty (most PRs merged without discussion), which is actually a positive signal - PRs were clear enough to merge without extensive back-and-forth.

---

Workflow Details

• Repository: github/gh-aw
• Workflow Run: §21942582622
• Analysis Date: 2026-02-12
• Coverage: 53 PRs merged in last 24 hours
• Quality: All charts generated at 300 DPI with professional styling

---

This comprehensive NLP analysis provides insights into Copilot PR communication patterns, sentiment trends, and content themes to inform continuous improvement of agentic workflow development practices.

AI generated by Copilot PR Conversation NLP Analysis

• expires on Feb 19, 2026, 10:36 AM UTC