You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
prioritizing the current line did the trick, and IMO made the whole concept work; smart autojump (the default) is not fully deterministic anyway, even if the search is directional, you might have to use a label for the first target too
we lose only 1 bit of information (versus 8-10 in the pattern itself)
in Normal mode, as opposed to Visual and O-p mode, we're not interested in the target in relation to our current position, we just want to jump there
Con
inconsistency between Normal and Visual/O-p mode (though there is a fundamental difference, see above)
prioritizing the current line did the trick, and IMO made the whole concept work; smart autojump (the default) is not fully deterministic anyway, even if the search is
What if always smart jump forward, and also put labels above?
Pro
Con
s{char}<enter><enter>...
) (related: Allow traversing directionally after bidirectional search #210)An old discussion in the Sneak repo: justinmk/vim-sneak#62
True, bidirectional mode means more visual noise.
Right... (but as mentioned above, it's still only 1 bit of information we're losing, the pattern itself contains a lot more)
With smart autojump (using an extended label set on demand), it's very rare to have additional steps, group switch is a truly exceptional case.
Fortunately, not a problem here. Use
/?
for their intended purpose, that is, searching in the unknown, and Leap for jumping to on-screen positions.Yeah, but "occasionally" = 50%.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: