Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

btree index too small? #1051

Open
pvgenuchten opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

btree index too small? #1051

pvgenuchten opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@pvgenuchten
Copy link
Contributor

pvgenuchten commented Dec 5, 2024

Description

We hit quite a lot that the btree index is defined too small on postgres to hold the content introduced by metadata elements, this typically occurs on the contacts and access constraints fields.

I wonder if the indexation code should limit the length of the field while inserting, based on the max allowed size of the btree index size

or is it more common to increase the size of the index?

Removing the index on that field would be another option, these fields are probably not used to filter, full text search is more relevant then

see also #398 and #942

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant