You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We hit quite a lot that the btree index is defined too small on postgres to hold the content introduced by metadata elements, this typically occurs on the contacts and access constraints fields.
I wonder if the indexation code should limit the length of the field while inserting, based on the max allowed size of the btree index size
or is it more common to increase the size of the index?
Removing the index on that field would be another option, these fields are probably not used to filter, full text search is more relevant then
Description
We hit quite a lot that the btree index is defined too small on postgres to hold the content introduced by metadata elements, this typically occurs on the contacts and access constraints fields.
I wonder if the indexation code should limit the length of the field while inserting, based on the max allowed size of the btree index size
or is it more common to increase the size of the index?
Removing the index on that field would be another option, these fields are probably not used to filter, full text search is more relevant then
see also #398 and #942
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: