Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@generate scope #4

Open
jonschlinkert opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

@generate scope #4

jonschlinkert opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Member

jonschlinkert commented Aug 9, 2018

we have the @generate scope on NPM. For the next release, we can either move all "utils" or non-generator libs to the @generate scope, or we can move all generators to the @generate scope.

I'm fine with either, we can automate most of it anyway. Also, since most generators are more likely to be installed globally than to be used as dependencies, I think a transition to use @generate/foo won't be quite as painful for users as it would be otherwise. We can just let ppl know that generate-foo is deprecated and to use @generate/foo going forward. This also gives us a clean way to differentiate "official" generators vs. generators published by users.

@doowb et al, thoughts?

@doowb
Copy link
Member

doowb commented Aug 9, 2018

I think we should move all the generators to the @generate scope. I don't think it imposes a barrier to people using them and they'll all be neatly put into the @generate folder in either global or local node_modules. I also like how it can differentiate between "official" generators and community generators.

@jonschlinkert
Copy link
Member Author

k, one more thing we might consider, is using the util-* prefix for non-generators.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants