We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In future versions of backrest the managed restic install will be named simply “restic” rather than “restic-x.x.x” with the version as the suffix.
This will make it easier to allowlist the managed restic binary on some platforms e.g. macOS which apply sandboxing for network and disk access.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Doesn't macOS hash the binary? If that is the case then I think that not having the version number is actually a UX downgrade than an improvement.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
In future versions of backrest the managed restic install will be named simply “restic” rather than “restic-x.x.x” with the version as the suffix.
This will make it easier to allowlist the managed restic binary on some platforms e.g. macOS which apply sandboxing for network and disk access.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: