-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider adding more word lists #4
Comments
Would you like me to fork and contribute with your project? Use Sublime Text and use Regex to Sandro's dictionary to select the brackets and all commas and remove JSON brackets and comma, and after press enter. And in XML, use Regex to select and remove all string tags. Observe that Atom isn't good for big files to select and remove. After use compare plugins in Atom, in Sublime Text and in Visual Studio Code to compare the dictionaries: Atomhttps://atom.io/packages/compare-files Sublime Texthttps://forum.sublimetext.com/t/how-to-diff-in-sublime-3/25335/9 Visual Studio Codehttp://dailydotnettips.com/2015/06/04/how-to-compare-files-in-visual-studio-code/ |
Regarding the 0xh3x (Giorgi Jvaridze) / scraped-words
One thing to keep in mind is that scraping was done 6 years ago. So even if some other wordlists might contain same sources, they might be more recent and contain more words. |
If you like to help, I'd be happy! - however comparing the word list and my dictionary doesn't make much sense - if you really want to go further than just removing the json formatting, you'll need to be able to run the build scripts (see README.md for a short description of the requirements). Then comparing has to be done to Bumbeishvili's words from the database and to Scannell's in Before you make any effort to include a word list, make sure that it is published with a license that allows us to integrate it into the dict and distribute it under MIT license (contact the author if needed - as it is the case with sandrinio) Sorry for the long text - I just want to avoid that you do your work in vain in the end... |
I checked GBoard on my mobile, at "About", it is said to be under open-source licences, some components under OFL, some others under BSD licence, some under Apache licence. I extracted the GBoard and found the licence. It is said that GBoard is under OFL licence. I attached GBoard's licence file for you. |
OFL = Open Font License - so probably GBoard contains some fonts under this license. The software itself seems to be proprietary, using libraries under BSD and Apache. |
Ah, I was wrong, then I mean all libraries are under BSD and Apache licences. But I'll contact Google team and return their answer to you, OK? |
მოგესალმებით, კარგი წამოწყებაა! ვეცდები ჩავერთო ლექსიკონის დახვეწის საქმეში. |
დიახ, არის საჭიროა! "/NSNN" არის ლექსიკონის "აფიქსი" ("affix", და ვხედავ |
მაგეებში უნდა გავერკვე. |
|
spell.on.ge - ამათ ხომ არ დაკავშირებიხართ, იქნებ გაგეერთიანებინათ ძალები? |
Having different sources for the word list might allow us to improve the quality of the dict by removing words that only appear in one of them and therefore might be wrong. This requires however, that the word lists used are really created from different texts.
The following word lists could be analyzed. If they are really from "disjoint" sources and found to improve the quality of our dictionary, we could include them in the default build scripts (if there are no licensing problems).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: