-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have reasonable feature parity with Tails regarding supported file types #2157
Comments
I took a look at the pre-installed software on Tails, according to various information sources:
File Viewers
FontsFonts also count towards file viewing experience. Here are the default ones in tails (from the code). Otherwise people open files and all they get is tofu.
Additionally, LibreOffice languages (some) and + Thunderbird ones are available MIME type inspectionsI took a look at the tails MIME and compared it to the diff sd-large-mime.cache tails-mime.cache
NOTE: mimeinfo cache on sd-viewer included some mimetypes with NOTE: (2) You may notice that despite the extra archiver programs that Tails ships with, there aren't well known additional archive mime types that Tails supports as mimetypes. This could be because those are mainly CLI programs or simply because they are redundant. What Tails has, which
Recommendations
As an extra point, it may be worth mentioning that we could make it clear to journalists that we're looking for feedback about files which were not "openable" in the workstation. |
Description
As part of the shift from Tails-based SVS to SDW, we should dump a list of all the supported file types in Tails and then install the same/similar viewing applications in the sd-viewer template.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: