I was comparing function addresses in payloads/s905d2/bl2dump_over_usb.c with the disassembled s905d2 bootrom dump I've found in this github repository. All functions declared in code match their addresses with bootrom dump except FUN_ffff454c that points to the middle of some function.
I'm not an expert in reverse engineering but this looks quite weird. Is is supposed to be like this, or does this dumped bootrom differ from yours?
