Replies: 3 comments
-
Do you mean stop scanning when the first VULNERABLE hit is found? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
yes, stop the scanning to save time when -q (quick scan) is provided ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
But maybe even better if it's configurable, something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
From using batch scanning toward thousands system controlled by saltstack server.
I found this feature is important, so that when a system has huge file system and contain many .jar files, log4j-finder to terminate the scan quickly without timeout. We can run another scan afterword if full list is needed.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions