Use two different sites for load balancing a resource in Pangolin

[marvinvr]

Hey!
Firstly, Pangolin is an Amazing Project, really love it!
I'm not super deep into the topic, but wouldn't having the ability to add separate sites for every target in a resource make the load balancing feature drastically more powerful? This would allow Pangolin to be the single point of entry into a Network and if one site is down it would route to the second target through a completely separate route, which would provide a basic form of high availability and redundancy.

[miloschwartz]

Yes, I agree it would make the load balancing feature be more useful. You could have services on completely different networks that you load balance between. We've discussed this internally, and I think it's something we plan to add but likely after leaving beta.

[ristedev]

very excited for this!

[clemone210]

instead of multiple sites, it would be great to have multiple connectors / tunnels so each tunnel can talk to each other and if one is down, the other becomes active.

[MatKlein]

That would’ve been a lifesaver tonight. My Proxmox Backup Server acts as the main tunnel into my network - low load, isolated from the rest. Unfortunately, it didn’t come back up after a power outage. If I had set up a second tunnel on a separate client (like a Pi or a PVE node), I could’ve avoided the resulting 4-hour downtime. Lesson learned 😉

[oschwartz10612]

Now available in 1.9.0! :}