Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

data replication #31

Open
ghost opened this issue Dec 20, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

data replication #31

ghost opened this issue Dec 20, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 20, 2015

clocker's internals could be reworked to write operations into an append-only log with hyperlog so that the clocker database can easily be replicated among different machines or across teams of people. The existing command-line interfaces can largely be preserved with a few small modifications to deal with occasional multi-value records. The list and data commands can read from a materialized view of the data created by a hyperlog index.

There was some discussion of this feature already in #12. If nothing else, this would be a very useful backup feature, and this indexing scheme will make it easier to generate different views of the underlying data in the future. This feature should also be integrated with a migration script to automatically port existing data into the new format.

@fnogatz
Copy link
Owner

fnogatz commented Jan 1, 2016

I would prefer to first discuss a list of goals we want to achieve with clocker. Currently I like it especially for its CLI and simplicity. For my personal use I only need a way to work across multiple machines, either by a git-like pull/push workflow or by a silently shared database. Plus even better CLI interfaces to pipe clocker's output to tools like cli-gh-cal. I would expect that teams would prefer some other time tracking tool.

@fnogatz
Copy link
Owner

fnogatz commented Jan 26, 2016

ping @substack

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant