Having two case
s in a switch
statement or two branches in an if
chain with the same implementation is at best
duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then in an if
chain they should be combined, or for a switch
, one should fall through to the other.
switch (i) {
case 1:
doFirstThing();
doSomething();
break;
case 2:
doSomethingDifferent();
break;
case 3: // Noncompliant; duplicates case 1's implementation
doFirstThing();
doSomething();
break;
default:
doTheRest();
}
if (a >= 0 && a < 10) {
doFirstThing();
doTheThing();
} else if (a >= 10 && a < 20) {
doTheOtherThing();
} else if (a >= 20 && a < 50) {
// Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
doFirstThing();
doTheThing();
} else {
doTheRest();
}
switch (i) {
case 1:
case 3:
doFirstThing();
doSomething();
break;
case 2:
doSomethingDifferent();
break;
default:
doTheRest();
}
if ((a >= 0 && a < 10) || (a >= 20 && a < 50)) {
doFirstThing();
doTheThing();
} else if (a >= 10 && a < 20) {
doTheOtherThing();
} else {
doTheRest();
}
or
switch (i) {
case 1:
doFirstThing();
doSomething();
break;
case 2:
doSomethingDifferent();
break;
case 3:
doFirstThing();
doThirdThing();
break;
default:
doTheRest();
}
if (a >= 0 && a < 10) {
doFirstThing();
doTheThing();
} else if (a >= 10 && a < 20) {
doTheOtherThing();
} else if (a >= 20 && a < 50) {
doFirstThing();
doTheThirdThing();
} else {
doTheRest();
}
Blocks in an if
chain that contain a single line of code are ignored, as are blocks in a switch
statement that
contain a single line of code with or without a following break.