-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to Bootstrap 4.5.0 #7327
Comments
mainly the browsable API/ admin stuffs? |
Issue here is that we're still on Bootstrap v3.x, and the upgrade to v4.x isn't just a swap it in. There's HTML changes throughout, which make it a good mini-project for a willing contributor. |
@carltongibson Something that’s not 100% clear to me. Are we okay with the jQuery update we’ve made? |
I guess so, since it oughta be backwards compatible |
Yeah... I believe so. Bar some dropping of browsers we don't support jQuery hasn't broken anything for a long while. |
@carltongibson -- I'd be willing to have a go at this if you think I have the skills (It is 'just' template layouts and bootstrap right...). |
kind of yes. |
@smithdc1: yes, it’s exactly that. Updating the Browsable API templates to use the newer version. (I didn’t look into it but I see v5 is on the way — don’t know if it’s worth skipping straight to that?) |
Yes v5 in alpha and a few alpha releases expected over the coming months weeks/months, my guess is v5 will be out in Q4. The main thing with v5 is it no longer depends upon jQuery. The upgrade from v4-v5 should be much easier than v3-v4. I'll go investigate. |
agree |
Super. Thanks. 🥇 |
On the topic of updating themes... What about the docs, they seem to be on bootstrap 2? |
@smithdc1 The docs are a mkdocs theme. In |
Any updates on this? Our team needs this for a security audit for medical industry. I'm not sure why Bootstrap 3.x is considered a security hole, but the hospitals are going to get the security audit report and they probably will not be able to be convinced that Bootstrap 3 javascript for dropdowns and form elements is not a security hole. We are kindof stuck :( |
Suggestion: bypass this and go straight for Bootstrap v5, see #7411. |
@carltongibson If possible, I would like to work on updating MkDocs theme in |
@jefferson2z — I'm sure @tomchristie would be happy to see input on updating the docs theme. #7411 is about bringing the Browseable API up to the latest bootstrap. I'm sure input would be welcome there too! 😀 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
As others have mentioned, the old version of bootstrap comes up in security audits. Moving to v5 would be great. |
Sadly, I don't have time to look at the whole code, but I'm still wondering: how can it take so long to switch to bootstrap v5? I mean, we're talking about CSS classes and I don't think there are that many templates to modify. We're stuck on a version 3 of bootstrap that's a bit “old-fashioned” and that makes the presentation not very attractive. I'm trying to introduce Django RestFramework to my company, and I have to be honest about the fact that the design isn't very convincing. I understand that views aren't the most important part of converting, but you know how it is... project managers... customers... they like “wow” effects. Translated with DeepL.com (free version) |
https://blog.getbootstrap.com/2020/05/12/bootstrap-4-5-0/
Related: #7313
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: