-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lsp-ui-doc frame is not hidden after the doc frame is unfocused #726
Comments
I can't reproduce your problem with needing to press tab twice, maybe it's related to tab being used for auto completion? In my setup I have bound The behavior on focus exit may be have changed, but I don't necessarily think it is a bug. I think that it's perfectly acceptable to cancel the auto-dismiss of the frame if the user has been explicitly interacting with it -- it then acts like a non-glance frame that you can focus in and out of as you wish. If you want |
(BTW, are you triggering the doc to appear via |
There is already a function for that,
I trigger it via |
I would not expect Even so, consistent behavior would be that the next command after The simple fix (keeping current/documented behavior of unfocus) would seem to be ensure that (Your embedded screencast is unclear to me, due to speed, auto-looping with no indication of position, and it does not show what keys are bound to what actions. Do you know of better screencast tools that at least allow control of playback speed?) |
You're correct about the part that you can't hide the frame that you're having focus into, else the focus will move away and you will have no idea where it is. |
That's a gif, I don't know any tool allow that though |
@kiennq Try #729, it lets you bind to (Aside, yesterday I found https://github.com/tarsius/keycast which will display both keys and bound actions, and also a log view, which might help make clearer casts) |
Thanks, that change seems working for me. The changes in #711 and #729 move the post command hook all the way to |
Seems to be regressed by #711, see #711 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: